WWT.NET Wisconsin Internet Provider | West Wisconsin Telcom

wwt.net Website Information

Daily Unique Visits: 801

Daily Page Views: 1,602

Income Per Day: $5

Estimated Value: $1,200

wwt.net is registered under .NET top-level domain. Please check other sites in .NET zone.

No name server records were found.

and is probably hosted by HOSTWINDS - Hostwinds LLC., US. See the full list of other websites hosted by HOSTWINDS - Hostwinds LLC., US.

The highest website wwt.net position in Alexa rank database was 175888 and the lowest rank position was 999814. Current position of wwt.net in Alexa rank database is 894744.

Desktop speed score of wwt.net (57/100) is better than the results of 31.79% of other sites and shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

Mobile usability score of wwt.net (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed score of wwt.net (46/100) is better than the results of 27.13% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Advertisement

wwt.net Alexa Rank

The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and is a combined measure of page views and users.


wwt.net whois

WHOIS gives you the ability to lookup any generic domains to find out the registered domain holder. WHOIS database are provided for information purposes only. It allows the public to check whether a specific domain name is still available or not and to obtain information related to the registration records of existing domain names.


Domain Name: WWT.NET
Registry Domain ID: 70132_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.srsplus.com
Registrar URL: http://www.srsplus.com
Updated Date: 2023-06-13T07:01:46Z
Creation Date: 1996-06-13T04:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2024-06-12T04:00:00Z
Registrar: TLDS L.L.C. d/b/a SRSPlus
Registrar IANA ID: 320
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: domain.operations@web.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8777228662
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS1.WWT.NET
Name Server: NS2.WWT.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2023-09-24T01:15:48Z

wwt.net server information

Servers Location

wwt.net desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2018-01-27


Desktop Speed Bad
57/100

wwt.net Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 45Reduce server response time

priority - 22Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 219.6KiB (69% reduction).

Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017…ound-Multi-Colored.png could save 66.9KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/facebook.png could save 49.7KiB (98% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017…Telcom-Footer-Logo.jpg could save 22.9KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Internet-Gold.jpg could save 17.5KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/smart-monitoring.jpg could save 13.4KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2015…consin-telcom-logo.jpg could save 10.4KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/TV-RED.jpg could save 8.3KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Phone-DKBLUE.jpg could save 7.2KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017…017-e1499375032258.png could save 5.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/instagram.png could save 4.7KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…images/search_icon.png could save 3.2KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…es/icons/instagram.png could save 2.7KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…ages/icons/twitter.png could save 2.7KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/twitter.png could save 2.3KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/youtube.png could save 2.3KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…ages/icons/youtube.png could save 132B (28% reduction).

priority - 8Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 8 blocking script resources and 6 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://wwt.net/technology/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-includes/js/jquery/j…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://www.youtube.com/iframe_api?ver=1.3.7
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-includes/js/underscore.min.js?ver=1.8.3
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porcelain/js/main.js?ver=1.3.7
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…nt-slider.js?ver=1.3.7
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-includes/js/comment-reply.min.js?ver=4.9.1
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.1

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/plugins/dupl…dmin.min.css?ver=2.1.1
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/plugins/popu…site.min.css?ver=1.6.6
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/plugins/wp-p…enavi-css.css?ver=2.70
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…ttyPhoto.css?ver=1.3.7
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porcelain/style.css?ver=1.3.7
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Acme|Montserrat

priority - 2Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 5% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.

priority - 1Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 11KiB (30% reduction).

Minifying https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porcelain/js/main.js?ver=1.3.7 could save 9.3KiB (29% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…nt-slider.js?ver=1.3.7 could save 1.8KiB (36% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 4.1KiB (18% reduction).

Minifying https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porcelain/style.css?ver=1.3.7 could save 4.1KiB (18% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 0Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 302B (41% reduction).

Compressing https://www.youtube.com/iframe_api?ver=1.3.7 could save 302B (41% reduction).

wwt.net Desktop Resource Breakdown

Total Resources47
Number of Hosts5
Static Resources3
JavaScript Resources11
CSS Resources6

wwt.net mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2018-01-28


Mobile Speed Bad
46/100

wwt.net Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 67Reduce server response time

priority - 32Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 8 blocking script resources and 6 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://wwt.net/technology/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-includes/js/jquery/j…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://www.youtube.com/iframe_api?ver=1.3.7
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-includes/js/underscore.min.js?ver=1.8.3
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porcelain/js/main.js?ver=1.3.7
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…nt-slider.js?ver=1.3.7
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-includes/js/comment-reply.min.js?ver=4.9.1
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.1

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/plugins/dupl…dmin.min.css?ver=2.1.1
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/plugins/popu…site.min.css?ver=1.6.6
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/plugins/wp-p…enavi-css.css?ver=2.70
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…ttyPhoto.css?ver=1.3.7
https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porcelain/style.css?ver=1.3.7
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Acme|Montserrat

priority - 22Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 213KiB (69% reduction).

Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017…ound-Multi-Colored.png could save 66.9KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/facebook.png could save 49.7KiB (98% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017…Telcom-Footer-Logo.jpg could save 22.9KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Internet-Gold.jpg could save 17.5KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/smart-monitoring.jpg could save 13.4KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2015…consin-telcom-logo.jpg could save 10.4KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/TV-RED.jpg could save 8.3KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Phone-DKBLUE.jpg could save 7.2KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/uploads/2017…017-e1499375032258.png could save 5.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…images/search_icon.png could save 3.2KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…es/icons/instagram.png could save 2.7KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…ages/icons/twitter.png could save 2.7KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…ges/mob-nav-icon_w.png could save 2.7KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…ages/icons/youtube.png could save 132B (28% reduction).

priority - 8Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 17% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.

priority - 1Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 11KiB (30% reduction).

Minifying https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porcelain/js/main.js?ver=1.3.7 could save 9.3KiB (29% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porce…nt-slider.js?ver=1.3.7 could save 1.8KiB (36% reduction) after compression.

priority - 1Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 0Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 4.1KiB (18% reduction).

Minifying https://wwt.net/technology/wp-content/themes/porcelain/style.css?ver=1.3.7 could save 4.1KiB (18% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 302B (41% reduction).

Compressing https://www.youtube.com/iframe_api?ver=1.3.7 could save 302B (41% reduction).

wwt.net Mobile Resource Breakdown

Total Resources47
Number of Hosts5
Static Resources3
JavaScript Resources11
CSS Resources6

wwt.net mobile page usability

Last tested: 2018-01-28


Mobile Usability Good
99/100

wwt.net Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 0Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <a href="tel:715-231-2000">715-231-2000</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.

wwt.net HTML validation

Warnings

The “type” attribute is unnecessary for JavaScript resources.

Line: 38 Column: 1 - 107
"...endif]--> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://wwt.net/technology/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4'></scri..." Line: 39 Column: 1 - 118
"...</script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://wwt.net/technology/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1'></scri..." Line: 40 Column: 1 - 82
"...</script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://www.youtube.com/iframe_api?ver=1.3.7'></scri..."

The “type” attribute for the “style” element is not needed and should be omitted.

Line: 74 Column: 1 - 23
"...TYLES --> <style type="text/css"> #logo..."

Errors

Bad start tag in “img” in “head”.

Line: 71 Column: 11 - 2
"...<noscript><img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=2065602820348317&ev=PageView&noscript=1" /></nosc..."

An “img” element must have an “alt” attribute, except under certain conditions. For details, consult guidance on providing text alternatives for images.

Line: 71 Column: 11 - 2
"...<noscript><img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=2065602820348317&ev=PageView&noscript=1" /></nosc..."

Stray end tag “noscript”.

Line: 71 Column: 3 - 13
"...ript=1" /></noscript> <!-- ..."

Element “style” not allowed as child of element “body” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)

Line: 74 Column: 1 - 23
"...TYLES --> <style type="text/css"> #logo..."

CSS: “padding”: “auto” is not a “padding” value.

Line: 124 Column: 35 - 38
"...auto 10px auto; } /..."

CSS: “height”: Parse Error.

Line: 128 Column: 30 - 35
"...*Orange*/ height;165px..."

CSS: Parse Error.

Line: 128 Column: - 43
".../ height;165px; background-col..." Line: 128 Column: 67 - 69
"...lor: rgba(252, 180,..." Line: 128 Column: 72 - 74
"...rgba(252, 180, 20, ..." Line: 128 Column: 77 - 78
"...252, 180, 20, 1); ..." Line: 131 Column: 14 - 20
"...rk-header #header { /*S..."

CSS: “font-color”: Property “font-color” doesn't exist.

Line: 209 Column: 102 - 107
"...ont-color:#fffff; font..."

Stray end tag “head”.

Line: 253 Column: 1 - 7
"...tics --> </head> <body..."

Start tag “body” seen but an element of the same type was already open.

Line: 254 Column: 1 - 148
"... </head> <body class="home page-template page-template-template-full-custom page-template-template-full-custom-php page page-id-2004 slider-active no-title"> <div ..."

Cannot recover after last error. Any further errors will be ignored.

Line: 254 Column: 1 - 148
"... </head> <body class="home page-template page-template-template-full-custom page-template-template-full-custom-php page page-id-2004 slider-active no-title"> <div ..."

wwt.net similar domains

Similar domains:
www.wwt.com
www.wwt.net
www.wwt.org
www.wwt.info
www.wwt.biz
www.wwt.us
www.wwt.mobi
www.wt.net
www.wwt.net
www.qwt.net
www.wqwt.net
www.qwwt.net
www.awt.net
www.wawt.net
www.awwt.net
www.swt.net
www.wswt.net
www.swwt.net
www.ewt.net
www.wewt.net
www.ewwt.net
www.wqt.net
www.wwqt.net
www.wat.net
www.wwat.net
www.wst.net
www.wwst.net
www.wet.net
www.wwet.net
www.ww.net
www.wwr.net
www.wwtr.net
www.wwrt.net
www.wwf.net
www.wwtf.net
www.wwft.net
www.wwg.net
www.wwtg.net
www.wwgt.net
www.wwy.net
www.wwty.net
www.wwyt.net

wwt.net Ping

Ping is a computer network administration software utility used to test the reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. It measures the round-trip time for messages sent from the originating host to a destination computer that are echoed back to the source.


wwt.net TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a computer network diagnostic tool for displaying the route (path) and measuring transit delays of packets across an Internet Protocol (IP) network. The history of the route is recorded as the round-trip times of the packets received from each successive host (remote node) in the route (path); the sum of the mean times in each hop is a measure of the total time spent to establish the connection. Traceroute proceeds unless all (three) sent packets are lost more than twice, then the connection is lost and the route cannot be evaluated.