WINFAQ.DE Die deutsche WinFAQ im Internet

winfaq.de Website Information

Daily Unique Visits: 3,387

Daily Page Views: 13,548

Income Per Day: $38

Estimated Value: $20,520

winfaq.de is registered under .DE top-level domain. Please check other sites in .DE zone.

No name server records were found.

and is probably hosted by Neue Medien Muennich GmbH. See the full list of other websites hosted by Neue Medien Muennich GmbH.

The highest website winfaq.de position in Alexa rank database was 17894 and the lowest rank position was 999341. Current position of winfaq.de in Alexa rank database is 370510.

Desktop speed score of winfaq.de (87/100) is better than the results of 84.39% of other sites and shows that the page is performing great on desktop computers.

Mobile usability score of winfaq.de (62/100) is better than the results of 7.29% of other sites and means that the page is not mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed score of winfaq.de (80/100) is better than the results of 88.23% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is excellent.

Advertisement

winfaq.de Alexa Rank

The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and is a combined measure of page views and users.


winfaq.de whois

WHOIS gives you the ability to lookup any generic domains to find out the registered domain holder. WHOIS database are provided for information purposes only. It allows the public to check whether a specific domain name is still available or not and to obtain information related to the registration records of existing domain names.


Domain: winfaq.de
Status: connect

winfaq.de server information

Servers Location

winfaq.de desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-05-06


Desktop Speed Good
87/100

winfaq.de Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 8Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://www.winfaq.de/css/basic.css (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/css/layout.css (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/artikel/RSW.NET_Beta.JPG (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/artikel/rsw_update.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/artikel/windows10.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/btn_more.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/content_article_bg.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/content_title_bg.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/head_color.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/head_site.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/ico_archive.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/search_input.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/search_submit.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/xml.gif (expiration not specified)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)

priority - 3Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 29.7KiB (55% reduction).

Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/content_article_bg.jpg could save 9.7KiB (59% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/artikel/rsw_update.jpg could save 6.5KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/artikel/windows10.jpg could save 6.5KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/artikel/RSW.NET_Beta.JPG could save 4.2KiB (52% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/head_color.jpg could save 1KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/search_input.gif could save 744B (76% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/search_submit.gif could save 574B (44% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/btn_more.gif could save 559B (44% reduction).

priority - 2Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 2 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

Use asynchronous versions of the following scripts:

http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://www.winfaq.de/css/basic.css
http://www.winfaq.de/css/layout.css

priority - 0Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 540B (15% reduction).

Minifying http://www.winfaq.de/ could save 540B (15% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 601B (52% reduction).

Minifying http://www.winfaq.de/css/basic.css could save 601B (52% reduction) after compression.

winfaq.de Desktop Resource Breakdown

Total Resources47
Number of Hosts11
Static Resources25
JavaScript Resources9
CSS Resources2

winfaq.de mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-05-24


Mobile Speed Medium
80/100

winfaq.de Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 12Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://www.winfaq.de/css/basic.css (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/css/layout.css (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/artikel/RSW.NET_Beta.JPG (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/artikel/rsw_update.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/artikel/windows10.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/btn_more.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/content_article_bg.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/content_title_bg.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/head_color.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/head_site.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/ico_archive.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/search_input.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/search_submit.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.winfaq.de/images/xml.gif (expiration not specified)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)

priority - 8Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 2 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

Use asynchronous versions of the following scripts:

http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://www.winfaq.de/css/basic.css
http://www.winfaq.de/css/layout.css

priority - 3Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 29.7KiB (55% reduction).

Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/content_article_bg.jpg could save 9.7KiB (59% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/artikel/rsw_update.jpg could save 6.5KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/artikel/windows10.jpg could save 6.5KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/artikel/RSW.NET_Beta.JPG could save 4.2KiB (52% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/head_color.jpg could save 1KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/search_input.gif could save 744B (76% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/search_submit.gif could save 574B (44% reduction).
Compressing http://www.winfaq.de/images/design/btn_more.gif could save 559B (44% reduction).

priority - 0Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 540B (15% reduction).

Minifying http://www.winfaq.de/ could save 540B (15% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 601B (52% reduction).

Minifying http://www.winfaq.de/css/basic.css could save 601B (52% reduction) after compression.

winfaq.de Mobile Resource Breakdown

Total Resources31
Number of Hosts6
Static Resources18
JavaScript Resources5
CSS Resources2

winfaq.de mobile page usability

Last tested: 2017-05-24


Mobile Usability Bad
62/100

winfaq.de Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 40Use legible font sizes

The following text on your page renders in a way that may be difficult for some of your visitors to read. Use legible font sizes to provide a better user experience.

The following text fragments have a small font size. Increase the font size to make them more legible.

WinFAQ - Die deutsche WinFAQ renders only 6 pixels tall (16 CSS pixels).

FAQ (Frequentl…ihre Antworten renders only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

Homepage renders only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

Registry System Wizard and 3 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

Tipps für: and 1 others render only 7 pixels tall (18 CSS pixels).

Weitere FAQ Seiten and 31 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

Registry System Wizard and 3 others render only 5 pixels tall (13 CSS pixels).

Registry System Wizard and 16 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

Mit RSS-Feed ü…tes Informiert renders only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

Auf dieser Sei…etriebssysteme and 16 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

WinFAQ - Die W…rosoft Windows renders only 7 pixels tall (18 CSS pixels).

Neue Versionen…m Wizard .NET" and 2 others render only 7 pixels tall (18 CSS pixels).

Benutzer von W…n Ruhe testen. and 8 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

Registry System Wizard .NET and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

: Version 1.16.930.3 and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

Anpassung der…ng nach Update and 5 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

Download and 2 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

Download and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

AGB / Datenschutz and 3 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

| Copyright ©…Frank Ullrich and 3 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

priority - 14Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <input type="submit" name="btnG"> is close to 1 other tap targets.

The tap target <input id="search-submit" type="image"> is close to 2 other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="faq_html/Conte…w95_inhalt.htm">Windows 95</a> and 31 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="faq_html/Conte…w10_inhalt.htm">Windows 10</a> and 14 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="team.htm">Team</a> is close to 2 other tap targets.

priority - 10Configure the viewport

Your page does not have a viewport specified. This causes mobile devices to render your page as it would appear on a desktop browser, scaling it down to fit on a mobile screen. Configure a viewport to allow your page to render properly on all devices.

winfaq.de HTML validation

Errors

Obsolete doctype. Expected “<!DOCTYPE html>”.

Line: 1 Column: 1 - 109
"...<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html..."

Attribute “value” not allowed on element “input” at this point.

Line: 42 Column: 21 - 110
"... <input type="image" src="images/design/search_submit.gif" id="search-submit" value="OK" /> ..."

Element “input” is missing required attribute “alt”.

Line: 42 Column: 21 - 110
"... <input type="image" src="images/design/search_submit.gif" id="search-submit" value="OK" /> ..."

Duplicate ID “category”.

Line: 88 Column: 4 - 21
"...n</h3> <ul id="category"> <..." Line: 204 Column: 4 - 21
"...ü</h2> <ul id="category"> ..." Line: 219 Column: 4 - 21
"...d</h3> <ul id="category"> <..." Line: 234 Column: 4 - 21
"...Q</h3> <ul id="category"> <..."

Warnings

The first occurrence of ID “category” was here.

Line: 71 Column: 4 - 21
"...:</h2> <ul id="category"> <..." Line: 71 Column: 4 - 21
"...:</h2> <ul id="category"> <..." Line: 71 Column: 4 - 21
"...:</h2> <ul id="category"> <..." Line: 71 Column: 4 - 21
"...:</h2> <ul id="category"> <..."

The “border” attribute is obsolete. Consider specifying “img { border: 0; }” in CSS instead.

Line: 194 Column: 7 - 102
"...0"> <img src="//ad.adnet.de/adi.php?s=30243;wxh=970x300" width="970" height="300" border="0" alt=""> ..."

This document appears to be written in German. Consider adding “lang="de"” (or variant) to the “html” start tag.

Line: 2 Column: 110 - 43
"...rict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head..."

winfaq.de similar domains

Similar domains:
www.winfaq.com
www.winfaq.net
www.winfaq.org
www.winfaq.info
www.winfaq.biz
www.winfaq.us
www.winfaq.mobi
www.infaq.de
www.winfaq.de
www.qinfaq.de
www.wqinfaq.de
www.qwinfaq.de
www.ainfaq.de
www.wainfaq.de
www.awinfaq.de
www.sinfaq.de
www.wsinfaq.de
www.swinfaq.de
www.einfaq.de
www.weinfaq.de
www.ewinfaq.de
www.wnfaq.de
www.wunfaq.de
www.wiunfaq.de
www.wuinfaq.de
www.wjnfaq.de
www.wijnfaq.de
www.wjinfaq.de
www.wknfaq.de
www.wiknfaq.de
www.wkinfaq.de
www.wonfaq.de
www.wionfaq.de
www.woinfaq.de
www.wifaq.de
www.wibfaq.de
www.winbfaq.de
www.wibnfaq.de
www.wihfaq.de
www.winhfaq.de
www.wihnfaq.de
www.wijfaq.de
www.winjfaq.de
www.wimfaq.de
www.winmfaq.de
www.wimnfaq.de
www.winaq.de
www.wincaq.de
www.winfcaq.de
www.wincfaq.de
www.windaq.de
www.winfdaq.de
www.windfaq.de
www.winraq.de
www.winfraq.de
www.winrfaq.de
www.wintaq.de
www.winftaq.de
www.wintfaq.de
www.wingaq.de
www.winfgaq.de
www.wingfaq.de
www.winvaq.de
www.winfvaq.de
www.winvfaq.de
www.winfq.de
www.winfqq.de
www.winfaqq.de
www.winfqaq.de
www.winfwq.de
www.winfawq.de
www.winfwaq.de
www.winfsq.de
www.winfasq.de
www.winfsaq.de
www.winfzq.de
www.winfazq.de
www.winfzaq.de
www.winfa.de
www.winfaa.de
www.winfaqa.de
www.winfaaq.de
www.winfaw.de
www.winfaqw.de

winfaq.de Ping

Ping is a computer network administration software utility used to test the reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. It measures the round-trip time for messages sent from the originating host to a destination computer that are echoed back to the source.


winfaq.de TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a computer network diagnostic tool for displaying the route (path) and measuring transit delays of packets across an Internet Protocol (IP) network. The history of the route is recorded as the round-trip times of the packets received from each successive host (remote node) in the route (path); the sum of the mean times in each hop is a measure of the total time spent to establish the connection. Traceroute proceeds unless all (three) sent packets are lost more than twice, then the connection is lost and the route cannot be evaluated.