TESTSIEGER.DE Testsieger.de: Testberichte, aktuelle Tests & Preisvergleich

testsieger.de Website Information

Daily Unique Visits: 5,053

Daily Page Views: 20,212

Income Per Day: $57

Estimated Value: $30,780

This website is located in Germany and is using following IP address 46.253.18.20. See the complete list of popular websites hosted in Germany.

testsieger.de is registered under .DE top-level domain. Please check other sites in .DE zone.

Website testsieger.de is using the following name servers:

  • ns3.fastdns.de
  • ns2.fastdns.de
  • ns1.fastdns.de

and is probably hosted by Megaspace Internet Services GmbH. See the full list of other websites hosted by Megaspace Internet Services GmbH.

The highest website testsieger.de position in Alexa rank database was 6917 and the lowest rank position was 969659. Current position of testsieger.de in Alexa rank database is 248346.

Desktop speed score of testsieger.de (61/100) is better than the results of 37.05% of other sites and shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

Mobile usability score of testsieger.de (100/100) is better than the results of 100% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed score of testsieger.de (56/100) is better than the results of 45.93% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Advertisement

testsieger.de Alexa Rank

The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and is a combined measure of page views and users.


testsieger.de whois

WHOIS gives you the ability to lookup any generic domains to find out the registered domain holder. WHOIS database are provided for information purposes only. It allows the public to check whether a specific domain name is still available or not and to obtain information related to the registration records of existing domain names.


Domain: testsieger.de
Status: connect

testsieger.de server information

Servers Location

testsieger.de desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-12-06


Desktop Speed Bad
61/100

testsieger.de Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 56Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 545.2KiB (53% reduction).

Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/…ser_Testportal_neu.jpg could save 138.2KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/…180117_Saugroboter.jpg could save 77.1KiB (49% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/…170530_Fernseher-1.jpg could save 57.5KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/…018017_Smartphones.jpg could save 50.3KiB (48% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/20170601_Epilierer.jpg could save 42.9KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/…01_MD_ver3_940x400.jpg could save 22.7KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…ebook_ver2-150x150.jpg could save 16.5KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/18345180362007824794 could save 16.4KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…itteuse_02-150x100.jpg could save 13.7KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/uploads/2-28-150x113.jpg could save 12.5KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…INH-SSD_03-150x100.jpg could save 12.2KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…ean-300_03-150x100.jpg could save 12KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…gro-500_04-150x100.jpg could save 11.9KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…orbell-2_02-150x99.jpg could save 11.5KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing https://imagesrv.adition.com/banners/3374/10679660/img/bkg.jpg could save 10.8KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…nannt-1-24-150x113.jpg could save 10KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…nannt-1-25-150x113.jpg could save 8.3KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/…n_ZMOT_SE9_220x200.jpg could save 7.8KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/…un_ZMOT_BT_220x200.jpg could save 7.1KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/images/main/desktop/sprite-recommendation.png could save 4.5KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/sterne-klein.png could save 763B (13% reduction).
Compressing https://imagesrv.adition.com/banners/3374/10679660/img/schwinge.png could save 289B (11% reduction).

priority - 9Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://imagesrv.adition.com/banners/3374/10679660/img/bkg.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://imagesrv.adition.com/banners/3374/10679660/img/schwinge.png (expiration not specified)
https://imagesrv.adition.com/banners/3374/10679660/img/sprite.png (expiration not specified)
https://imagesrv.adition.com/banners/3374/10679660/img/txt1.png (expiration not specified)
https://imagesrv.adition.com/banners/3374/10679660/img/txt2.png (expiration not specified)
https://imagesrv.adition.com/banners/3374/10679660/img/txt3.png (expiration not specified)
https://imagesrv.adition.com/banners/3374/10679660/index.min.css (expiration not specified)
https://imagesrv.adition.com/banners/3374/10679660/js/anim.min.js (expiration not specified)
https://imagesrv.adition.com/banners/3374/10679660…lus-html5-3.5.0.min.js (expiration not specified)
https://imagesrv.adition.com/js/AditionH5_ClickTags.js (expiration not specified)
https://imagesrv.adition.com/js/adition.js (expiration not specified)
https://ad1.adfarm1.adition.com/js?wp_id=4502593&kid=3456809 (10 minutes)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-W8HFXR6 (15 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…osd.js?cb=%2Fr20100101 (50 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…ner.js?cache=r20110914 (50 minutes)
https://js-agent.newrelic.com/nr-1153.min.js (2 hours)
https://script.ioam.de/iam.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 2Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/yt-gdpr/yt-gdpr.css?ver=1.0

priority - 0Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.8KiB (19% reduction).

Minifying https://script.ioam.de/iam.js could save 1.2KiB (14% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/megam…xmegamenu.js?ver=2.7.3 could save 1KiB (24% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/megam…ts/public.js?ver=1.9.1 could save 669B (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/ads-201901/ads/ads_home.js could save 429B (36% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/ads-2…1/ts_js.js?ver=1.0.120 could save 178B (12% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/ads-2…ticky.min.js?ver=1.0.8 could save 144B (25% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/ads-2…nview.min.js?ver=1.0.8 could save 140B (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/uk-co…onsent-js.js?ver=2.3.0 could save 119B (18% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 2.5KiB (59% reduction).

Compressing https://ad1.adfarm1.adition.com/banner?sid=4502593…es=175&wpt=J&clickurl= could save 2KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing https://ad1.adfarm1.adition.com/js?wp_id=4502593&kid=3456809 could save 530B (50% reduction).

priority - 0Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.5KiB (23% reduction).

Minifying https://imagesrv.adition.com/banners/3374/10679660…url%3D&h5Params=%7B%7D could save 1.5KiB (23% reduction) after compression.

testsieger.de Desktop Resource Breakdown

Total Resources120
Number of Hosts23
Static Resources41
JavaScript Resources45
CSS Resources13

testsieger.de mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-12-06


Mobile Speed Bad
56/100

testsieger.de Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 74Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 725.8KiB (61% reduction).

Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/…r_Testportal_mobil.jpg could save 201.2KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/…ser_800_x_400_ver3.jpg could save 152.7KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/…180117_Saugroboter.jpg could save 77.1KiB (49% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/…170530_Fernseher-1.jpg could save 57.5KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/…018017_Smartphones.jpg could save 50.3KiB (48% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/20170601_Epilierer.jpg could save 42.9KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…ebook_ver2-150x150.jpg could save 16.5KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…itteuse_02-150x100.jpg could save 13.7KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/uploads/2-28-150x113.jpg could save 12.5KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…INH-SSD_03-150x100.jpg could save 12.2KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…ean-300_03-150x100.jpg could save 12KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…gro-500_04-150x100.jpg could save 11.9KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…orbell-2_02-150x99.jpg could save 11.5KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…nannt-1-24-150x113.jpg could save 10KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/7175587801032028048 could save 9.8KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/testportal/wp-content/up…nannt-1-25-150x113.jpg could save 8.3KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/…n_ZMOT_SE9_220x200.jpg could save 7.8KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/…un_ZMOT_BT_220x200.jpg could save 7.1KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing https://s2.adform.net/Banners/36070986/36070986.jpg?bv=1 could save 6KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing https://www.testsieger.de/images/main/desktop/sprite-recommendation.png could save 4.5KiB (23% reduction).

priority - 8Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/yt-gdpr/yt-gdpr.css?ver=1.0

priority - 3Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-W8HFXR6 (15 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…osd.js?cb=%2Fr20100101 (50 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…ner.js?cache=r20110914 (50 minutes)
https://js-agent.newrelic.com/nr-1153.min.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 0Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 2.6KiB (22% reduction).

Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/megam…xmegamenu.js?ver=2.7.3 could save 1KiB (24% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/megam…ts/public.js?ver=1.9.1 could save 669B (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/ads-2…ads/ads_home_mobile.js could save 328B (27% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/ads-2…1/ts_js.js?ver=1.0.120 could save 178B (12% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/ads-2…ticky.min.js?ver=1.0.8 could save 144B (25% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/ads-2…nview.min.js?ver=1.0.8 could save 140B (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/plugins/uk-co…onsent-js.js?ver=2.3.0 could save 119B (18% reduction) after compression.

testsieger.de Mobile Resource Breakdown

Total Resources137
Number of Hosts19
Static Resources56
JavaScript Resources49
CSS Resources13

testsieger.de mobile page usability

Last tested: 2019-12-06


Mobile Usability Good
100/100

testsieger.de HTML validation

Errors

Bad value “https://api.w.org/” for attribute “rel” on element “link”: The string “https://api.w.org/” is not a registered keyword.

Line: 83 Column: 1 - 75
"...</script> <link rel='https://api.w.org/' href='https://www.testsieger.de/wp-json/' /> <!-- ..."

Element “div” not allowed as child of element “ul” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)

Line: 147 Column: 60 - 117
"...vbar-nav"><div id="mega-menu-wrap-menu_main" class="mega-menu-wrap"><div c..."

End tag “p” implied, but there were open elements.

Line: 200 Column: 21 - 59
"... <div class="btn btn-primary btn-block">Zum Pr..." Line: 231 Column: 21 - 59
"... <div class="btn btn-primary btn-block">Zum Pr..." Line: 262 Column: 21 - 59
"... <div class="btn btn-primary btn-block">Zum Pr..." Line: 293 Column: 21 - 59
"... <div class="btn btn-primary btn-block">Zum Pr..." Line: 331 Column: 21 - 59
"... <div class="btn btn-primary btn-block">Zum Pr..." Line: 362 Column: 21 - 59
"... <div class="btn btn-primary btn-block">Zum Pr..." Line: 393 Column: 21 - 59
"... <div class="btn btn-primary btn-block">Zum Pr..." Line: 424 Column: 21 - 59
"... <div class="btn btn-primary btn-block">Zum Pr..."

Unclosed element “span”.

Line: 199 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 230 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 261 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 292 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 330 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 361 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 392 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 423 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..."

Stray end tag “span”.

Line: 202 Column: 6 - 12
"... </span> ..." Line: 233 Column: 6 - 12
"... </span> ..." Line: 264 Column: 6 - 12
"... </span> ..." Line: 295 Column: 6 - 12
"... </span> ..." Line: 333 Column: 6 - 12
"... </span> ..." Line: 364 Column: 6 - 12
"... </span> ..." Line: 395 Column: 6 - 12
"... </span> ..." Line: 426 Column: 6 - 12
"... </span> ..."

No “p” element in scope but a “p” end tag seen.

Line: 204 Column: 19 - 22
"... </p> ..." Line: 235 Column: 19 - 22
"... </p> ..." Line: 266 Column: 19 - 22
"... </p> ..." Line: 297 Column: 19 - 22
"... </p> ..." Line: 335 Column: 19 - 22
"... </p> ..." Line: 366 Column: 19 - 22
"... </p> ..." Line: 397 Column: 19 - 22
"... </p> ..." Line: 428 Column: 19 - 22
"... </p> ..."

Duplicate ID “pvclickout”.

Line: 230 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 261 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 292 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 330 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 361 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 392 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 423 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..."

An “img” element must have an “alt” attribute, except under certain conditions. For details, consult guidance on providing text alternatives for images.

Line: 495 Column: 1 - 114
"....jpg 2x"> <img src="https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Nespresso-Teaser_Desk.jpg" style="max-width: 100%"> </pic..." Line: 499 Column: 1 - 128
"....jpg 2x"> <img src="https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Kuechenhelfer_TS_Startseite_940x200.jpg" style="max-width: 100%"> </pic..." Line: 538 Column: 202 - 362
"...gn=FHR"><img style="width: 220px; margin: -9px auto 10px auto;" src="https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Braun_FHR_D_Stoppelfrei_ZMOT_17_220x200.jpg" /></a></p>..." Line: 547 Column: 203 - 360
"...gn=MHR"><img style="width: 220px; margin: -9px auto 10px auto;" src="https://www.testsieger.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Braun_MHR_Contextual_DACH_17_220x200.gif" /></a></p>..."

Element “script” must not have attribute “charset” unless attribute “src” is also specified.

Line: 715 Column: 1 - 47
"...</script> <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> $(win..."

Warnings

The first occurrence of ID “pvclickout” was here.

Line: 199 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 199 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 199 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 199 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 199 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 199 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..." Line: 199 Column: 19 - 40
"... <span id="pvclickout"> ..."

testsieger.de similar domains

Similar domains:
www.testsieger.com
www.testsieger.net
www.testsieger.org
www.testsieger.info
www.testsieger.biz
www.testsieger.us
www.testsieger.mobi
www.estsieger.de
www.testsieger.de
www.restsieger.de
www.trestsieger.de
www.rtestsieger.de
www.festsieger.de
www.tfestsieger.de
www.ftestsieger.de
www.gestsieger.de
www.tgestsieger.de
www.gtestsieger.de
www.yestsieger.de
www.tyestsieger.de
www.ytestsieger.de
www.tstsieger.de
www.twstsieger.de
www.tewstsieger.de
www.twestsieger.de
www.tsstsieger.de
www.tesstsieger.de
www.tsestsieger.de
www.tdstsieger.de
www.tedstsieger.de
www.tdestsieger.de
www.trstsieger.de
www.terstsieger.de
www.tetsieger.de
www.tewtsieger.de
www.teswtsieger.de
www.teetsieger.de
www.tesetsieger.de
www.teestsieger.de
www.tedtsieger.de
www.tesdtsieger.de
www.teztsieger.de
www.tesztsieger.de
www.tezstsieger.de
www.textsieger.de
www.tesxtsieger.de
www.texstsieger.de
www.teatsieger.de
www.tesatsieger.de
www.teastsieger.de
www.tessieger.de
www.tesrsieger.de
www.testrsieger.de
www.tesrtsieger.de
www.tesfsieger.de
www.testfsieger.de
www.tesftsieger.de
www.tesgsieger.de
www.testgsieger.de
www.tesgtsieger.de
www.tesysieger.de
www.testysieger.de
www.tesytsieger.de
www.testieger.de
www.testwieger.de
www.testswieger.de
www.testwsieger.de
www.testeieger.de
www.testseieger.de
www.testesieger.de
www.testdieger.de
www.testsdieger.de
www.testdsieger.de
www.testzieger.de
www.testszieger.de
www.testzsieger.de
www.testxieger.de
www.testsxieger.de
www.testxsieger.de
www.testaieger.de
www.testsaieger.de
www.testasieger.de
www.testseger.de
www.testsueger.de
www.testsiueger.de
www.testsuieger.de
www.testsjeger.de
www.testsijeger.de
www.testsjieger.de
www.testskeger.de
www.testsikeger.de
www.testskieger.de
www.testsoeger.de
www.testsioeger.de
www.testsoieger.de
www.testsiger.de
www.testsiwger.de
www.testsiewger.de
www.testsiweger.de
www.testsisger.de
www.testsiesger.de
www.testsiseger.de
www.testsidger.de
www.testsiedger.de
www.testsideger.de
www.testsirger.de
www.testsierger.de
www.testsireger.de
www.testsieer.de
www.testsiefer.de
www.testsiegfer.de
www.testsiefger.de
www.testsiever.de
www.testsiegver.de
www.testsievger.de
www.testsieter.de
www.testsiegter.de
www.testsietger.de
www.testsieber.de
www.testsiegber.de
www.testsiebger.de
www.testsieyer.de
www.testsiegyer.de
www.testsieyger.de
www.testsieher.de
www.testsiegher.de
www.testsiehger.de
www.testsiegr.de
www.testsiegwr.de
www.testsiegewr.de
www.testsiegwer.de
www.testsiegsr.de
www.testsiegesr.de
www.testsiegser.de
www.testsiegdr.de
www.testsiegedr.de
www.testsiegder.de
www.testsiegrr.de
www.testsiegerr.de
www.testsiegrer.de
www.testsiege.de
www.testsiegee.de
www.testsiegere.de
www.testsiegeer.de
www.testsieged.de
www.testsiegerd.de
www.testsiegef.de
www.testsiegerf.de
www.testsiegefr.de
www.testsieget.de
www.testsiegert.de
www.testsiegetr.de

testsieger.de Ping

Ping is a computer network administration software utility used to test the reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. It measures the round-trip time for messages sent from the originating host to a destination computer that are echoed back to the source.


testsieger.de TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a computer network diagnostic tool for displaying the route (path) and measuring transit delays of packets across an Internet Protocol (IP) network. The history of the route is recorded as the round-trip times of the packets received from each successive host (remote node) in the route (path); the sum of the mean times in each hop is a measure of the total time spent to establish the connection. Traceroute proceeds unless all (three) sent packets are lost more than twice, then the connection is lost and the route cannot be evaluated.