itil.org Website Information
Daily Unique Visits: 826
Daily Page Views: 1,652
Income Per Day: $5
Estimated Value: $1,200
This website is located in Switzerland and is using following IP address 212.25.25.11. See the complete list of popular websites hosted in Switzerland.
itil.org is registered under .ORG top-level domain. Please check other sites in .ORG zone.
Website itil.org is using the following name servers:
- ns1.interway.ch
- ns3.interway.ch
- ns2.interway.ch
and is probably hosted by Iway AG. See the full list of other websites hosted by Iway AG.
The highest website itil.org position in Alexa rank database was 40632 and the lowest rank position was 999975. Current position of itil.org in Alexa rank database is 868508.
Desktop speed score of itil.org (72/100) is better than the results of 54.39% of other sites and shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
Mobile usability score of itil.org (98/100) is better than the results of 55.61% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed score of itil.org (45/100) is better than the results of 25.64% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Advertisement
itil.org Alexa Rank
The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and is a combined measure of page views and users.
itil.org whois
WHOIS gives you the ability to lookup any generic domains to find out the registered domain holder. WHOIS database are provided for information purposes only. It allows the public to check whether a specific domain name is still available or not and to obtain information related to the registration records of existing domain names.
Domain Name: ITIL.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D74615311-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.registrygate.com
Registrar URL: http://www.registrygate.com
Updated Date: 2021-07-04T01:21:41Z
Creation Date: 2001-07-03T11:16:51Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-07-03T11:16:51Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: RegistryGate GmbH
Registrar IANA ID: 1328
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@registrygate.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +49.1805734437
Reseller:
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Registrant Organization: Glenfis AG
Registrant State/Province:
Registrant Country: CH
Name Server: NS2.INTERWAY.CH
Name Server: NS1.INTERWAY.CH
Name Server: NS3.INTERWAY.CH
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form https://www.icann.org/wicf/)
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2022-01-26T07:55:02Z
Registry Domain ID: D74615311-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.registrygate.com
Registrar URL: http://www.registrygate.com
Updated Date: 2021-07-04T01:21:41Z
Creation Date: 2001-07-03T11:16:51Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-07-03T11:16:51Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: RegistryGate GmbH
Registrar IANA ID: 1328
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@registrygate.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +49.1805734437
Reseller:
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Registrant Organization: Glenfis AG
Registrant State/Province:
Registrant Country: CH
Name Server: NS2.INTERWAY.CH
Name Server: NS1.INTERWAY.CH
Name Server: NS3.INTERWAY.CH
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form https://www.icann.org/wicf/)
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2022-01-26T07:55:02Z
itil.org server information
Servers Location
itil.org desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-04-24
Desktop Speed
Medium
72/100
itil.org Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 21Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 205.9KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IT…BIT-5.emf_-537x297.png could save 42KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/revslider/home1/slide1.jpg could save 38.6KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/100tools-537x357.png could save 27.3KiB (13% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/itil_logo.png could save 20.4KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/wetrun-537x269.jpg could save 16.4KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/TOM-Blueprint-537x337.png could save 14.5KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/In…luss-IT4IT-537x231.png could save 10.9KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/IMG_7368-1-537x403.jpg could save 9.6KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/th…6522-large-537x453.jpg could save 6.4KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/img/logo.png could save 5.9KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/img/logo_black.png could save 5.9KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/br…dark-cloud-550x450.jpg could save 5.8KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/po…dbyglenfis70pxblau.png could save 1.2KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/poweredbyglenfis70px.png could save 1KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/revslider/home1/slide1.jpg could save 38.6KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/100tools-537x357.png could save 27.3KiB (13% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/itil_logo.png could save 20.4KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/wetrun-537x269.jpg could save 16.4KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/TOM-Blueprint-537x337.png could save 14.5KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/In…luss-IT4IT-537x231.png could save 10.9KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/IMG_7368-1-537x403.jpg could save 9.6KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/th…6522-large-537x453.jpg could save 6.4KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/img/logo.png could save 5.9KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/img/logo_black.png could save 5.9KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/br…dark-cloud-550x450.jpg could save 5.8KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/po…dbyglenfis70pxblau.png could save 1.2KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/poweredbyglenfis70px.png could save 1KiB (28% reduction).
priority - 12Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking script resources and 6 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/cache/wpfc-minifie…bd3/1490367999index.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Raleway:100…00italic,900,900italic
http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/cache/wpfc-minifie…a6/1490367999index.css
http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/cache/wpfc-minifie…30/1490368081index.css
http://netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/3.2.1/…some.min.css?ver=1.3.9
http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/cache/wpfc-minifie…16/1490367999index.css
http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/cache/wpfc-minifie…44/1490367999index.css
http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/cache/wpfc-minifie…a6/1490367999index.css
http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/cache/wpfc-minifie…30/1490368081index.css
http://netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/3.2.1/…some.min.css?ver=1.3.9
http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/cache/wpfc-minifie…16/1490367999index.css
http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/cache/wpfc-minifie…44/1490367999index.css
priority - 4Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 34.8KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/c…fonts/ElegantIcons.ttf could save 30.3KiB (52% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/revslider/…s/revicons.ttf?5510888 could save 4.5KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/revslider/…s/revicons.ttf?5510888 could save 4.5KiB (39% reduction).
priority - 1Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 5.9KiB (25% reduction).
Minifying http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/j…Sel-6.2.1.js?ver=4.7.3 could save 4KiB (23% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/rotatingtw…ating_tweet.js?ver=1.9 could save 1.1KiB (34% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/j…on-slider.js?ver=4.7.3 could save 848B (37% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/rotatingtw…ating_tweet.js?ver=1.9 could save 1.1KiB (34% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/j…on-slider.js?ver=4.7.3 could save 848B (37% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 738B (11% reduction).
Minifying http://blog.itil.org/wp-content/cache/wpfc-minifie…a6/1490367999index.css could save 738B (11% reduction) after compression.
itil.org Desktop Resource Breakdown
| Total Resources | 62 |
| Number of Hosts | 5 |
| Static Resources | 51 |
| JavaScript Resources | 25 |
| CSS Resources | 6 |
itil.org mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-07-03
Mobile Speed
Bad
45/100
itil.org Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 78Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 764KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/AIOps-Entry-2.png could save 375.8KiB (12% reduction).
Compressing https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/ESM-Bild.png could save 266.1KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/O…alue-Chain-550x498.png could save 58.4KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/O…gement-Value-Chain.png could save 37.1KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/digital-transformation.jpg could save 20.8KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/itil_logo.png could save 5.8KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/ESM-Bild.png could save 266.1KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/O…alue-Chain-550x498.png could save 58.4KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/O…gement-Value-Chain.png could save 37.1KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/digital-transformation.jpg could save 20.8KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/itil_logo.png could save 5.8KiB (27% reduction).
priority - 48Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 23 blocking script resources and 23 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/revslider…tools.min.js?ver=5.2.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/revslider…ution.min.js?ver=5.2.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/mediaelement/…n.js?ver=4.2.6-78496d1
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/mediaelement/…grate.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/js/qode-like.js?ver=1.0
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/mediaelement/…ement.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/js/plugins.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…Sel-6.2.1.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…lPage.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…on-slider.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…wheel.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…Swipe.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/js_compos….pkgd.min.js?ver=5.4.5
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…amic.js?ver=1496060520
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…fault.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…m_js.js?ver=1496060520
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…othScroll.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/js_compos…front.min.js?ver=5.4.5
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/rotatingt…e.all.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/rotatingt…ing_tweet.js?ver=1.9.7
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/revslider…tools.min.js?ver=5.2.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/revslider…ution.min.js?ver=5.2.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/mediaelement/…n.js?ver=4.2.6-78496d1
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/mediaelement/…grate.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/js/qode-like.js?ver=1.0
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/mediaelement/…ement.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/js/plugins.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…Sel-6.2.1.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…lPage.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…on-slider.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…wheel.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…Swipe.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/js_compos….pkgd.min.js?ver=5.4.5
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…amic.js?ver=1496060520
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…fault.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…m_js.js?ver=1496060520
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…othScroll.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/js_compos…front.min.js?ver=5.4.5
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/rotatingt…e.all.min.js?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/rotatingt…ing_tweet.js?ver=1.9.7
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Raleway:10…00italic,900,900italic
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/better-cl…css/styles.css?ver=3.0
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/menu-image/menu-image.css?ver=1.1
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/revslider…settings.css?ver=5.2.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/rotatingt…ss/style.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/sitepress…zontal/style.css?ver=1
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/style.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…heet.min.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…mic.css?ver=1496060520
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…some.min.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…tyle.min.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…ns/style.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/mediaelement/….css?ver=4.2.6-78496d1
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/mediaelement/…ment.min.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…sive.min.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…ive.css?ver=1496060520
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/js_compos…oser.min.css?ver=5.4.5
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…css.css?ver=1496060520
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…ylesheet.css?ver=4.9.6
https://netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/3.2.1…some.min.css?ver=1.3.9
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm-child/style.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/style.css
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/count-per-day/counter.css
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/better-cl…css/styles.css?ver=3.0
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/menu-image/menu-image.css?ver=1.1
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/revslider…settings.css?ver=5.2.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/rotatingt…ss/style.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/sitepress…zontal/style.css?ver=1
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/style.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…heet.min.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…mic.css?ver=1496060520
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…some.min.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…tyle.min.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…ns/style.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/mediaelement/….css?ver=4.2.6-78496d1
https://blog.itil.org/wp-includes/js/mediaelement/…ment.min.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…sive.min.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…ive.css?ver=1496060520
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/js_compos…oser.min.css?ver=5.4.5
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…css.css?ver=1496060520
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…ylesheet.css?ver=4.9.6
https://netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/3.2.1…some.min.css?ver=1.3.9
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm-child/style.css?ver=4.9.6
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/style.css
https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/count-per-day/counter.css
priority - 8Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
Only about 53% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
Click to see the screenshot with only the HTML response:
priority - 1Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 7.9KiB (27% reduction).
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…Sel-6.2.1.js?ver=4.9.6 could save 4KiB (23% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…othScroll.js?ver=4.9.6 could save 1.6KiB (41% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/rotatingt…ing_tweet.js?ver=1.9.7 could save 1.1KiB (34% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…on-slider.js?ver=4.9.6 could save 848B (37% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…wheel.min.js?ver=4.9.6 could save 222B (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…amic.js?ver=1496060520 could save 208B (14% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…othScroll.js?ver=4.9.6 could save 1.6KiB (41% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/rotatingt…ing_tweet.js?ver=1.9.7 could save 1.1KiB (34% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…on-slider.js?ver=4.9.6 could save 848B (37% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…wheel.min.js?ver=4.9.6 could save 222B (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/…amic.js?ver=1496060520 could save 208B (14% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.6KiB (33% reduction).
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/revslider…settings.css?ver=5.2.6 could save 2.1KiB (28% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm-child/style.css?ver=4.9.6 could save 610B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/rotatingt…ss/style.css?ver=4.9.6 could save 314B (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/style.css could save 314B (94% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/style.css?ver=4.9.6 could save 314B (94% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm-child/style.css?ver=4.9.6 could save 610B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/plugins/rotatingt…ss/style.css?ver=4.9.6 could save 314B (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/style.css could save 314B (94% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://blog.itil.org/wp-content/themes/stockholm/style.css?ver=4.9.6 could save 314B (94% reduction) after compression.
itil.org Mobile Resource Breakdown
| Total Resources | 81 |
| Number of Hosts | 5 |
| Static Resources | 3 |
| JavaScript Resources | 28 |
| CSS Resources | 23 |
itil.org mobile page usability
Last tested: 2018-07-03
Mobile Usability
Good
98/100
itil.org Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 1Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
The tap target
The tap target
<li class="filter">Alle</li> and 5 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://blog.i…g/wp-login.php">Anmelden</a> and 6 others are close to other tap targets.itil.org HTML validation
Warnings
Consider avoiding viewport values that prevent users from resizing documents.
Line: 5 Column: 1 - 84
"...UTF-8" /> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1,user-scalable=no"> <titl..."
"...UTF-8" /> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1,user-scalable=no"> <titl..."
Attribute “"” is not serializable as XML 1.0.
Line: 825 Column: 165 - 217
"...owered by <a href="http://www.glenfis.ch/de" " target="_blank">Glenfi..."
"...owered by <a href="http://www.glenfis.ch/de" " target="_blank">Glenfi..."
Errors
Bad value for attribute “href” on element “link”: Illegal character in query: “|” is not allowed.
Line: 18 Column: 104 - 457
"...;</script><link href='//fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Raleway:100,100italic,200,200italic,300,300italic,400,400italic,500,500italic,600,600italic,700,700italic,800,800italic,900,900italic|Crete+Round:100,100italic,200,200italic,300,300italic,400,400italic,500,500italic,600,600italic,700,700italic,800,800italic,900,900italic' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' /> <link..."
"...;</script><link href='//fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Raleway:100,100italic,200,200italic,300,300italic,400,400italic,500,500italic,600,600italic,700,700italic,800,800italic,900,900italic|Crete+Round:100,100italic,200,200italic,300,300italic,400,400italic,500,500italic,600,600italic,700,700italic,800,800italic,900,900italic' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' /> <link..."
Bad value “https://api.w.org/” for attribute “rel” on element “link”: The string “https://api.w.org/” is not a registered keyword.
Line: 107 Column: 1 - 71
"...</script> <link rel='https://api.w.org/' href='https://blog.itil.org/wp-json/' /> <link..."
"...</script> <link rel='https://api.w.org/' href='https://blog.itil.org/wp-json/' /> <link..."
The “border” attribute on the “table” element is obsolete. Use CSS instead.
Line: 458 Column: 1 - 32
"...(this);"> <table border="0" class="table"> <tr> ..."
"...(this);"> <table border="0" class="table"> <tr> ..."
Start tag “input” seen in “table”.
Line: 471 Column: 6 - 52
".../td> </tr><input type="hidden" name="format" value="h" /> <tr> ..."
".../td> </tr><input type="hidden" name="format" value="h" /> <tr> ..."
Element “input” not allowed as child of element “tbody” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
Line: 471 Column: 6 - 52
".../td> </tr><input type="hidden" name="format" value="h" /> <tr> ..."
".../td> </tr><input type="hidden" name="format" value="h" /> <tr> ..."
Attribute “rel” not allowed on element “span” at this point.
Line: 778 Column: 36 - 50
"...e_button"><span rel="22"><a hre..."
"...e_button"><span rel="22"><a hre..."
Saw “"” when expecting an attribute name. Probable cause: “=” missing immediately before.
Line: 825 Column: - 200
"...glenfis.ch/de" " target="_blan..."
"...glenfis.ch/de" " target="_blan..."
Attribute “"” not allowed on element “a” at this point.
Line: 825 Column: 165 - 217
"...owered by <a href="http://www.glenfis.ch/de" " target="_blank">Glenfi..."
"...owered by <a href="http://www.glenfis.ch/de" " target="_blank">Glenfi..."
itil.org similar domains
Similar domains:
www.itil.com
www.itil.net
www.itil.org
www.itil.info
www.itil.biz
www.itil.us
www.itil.mobi
www.til.org
www.itil.org
www.util.org
www.iutil.org
www.uitil.org
www.jtil.org
www.ijtil.org
www.jitil.org
www.ktil.org
www.iktil.org
www.kitil.org
www.otil.org
www.iotil.org
www.oitil.org
www.iil.org
www.iril.org
www.itril.org
www.irtil.org
www.ifil.org
www.itfil.org
www.iftil.org
www.igil.org
www.itgil.org
www.igtil.org
www.iyil.org
www.ityil.org
www.iytil.org
www.itl.org
www.itul.org
www.itiul.org
www.ituil.org
www.itjl.org
www.itijl.org
www.itjil.org
www.itkl.org
www.itikl.org
www.itkil.org
www.itol.org
www.itiol.org
www.itoil.org
www.iti.org
www.itip.org
www.itilp.org
www.itipl.org
www.itio.org
www.itilo.org
www.itik.org
www.itilk.org
www.itil.net
www.itil.org
www.itil.info
www.itil.biz
www.itil.us
www.itil.mobi
www.til.org
www.itil.org
www.util.org
www.iutil.org
www.uitil.org
www.jtil.org
www.ijtil.org
www.jitil.org
www.ktil.org
www.iktil.org
www.kitil.org
www.otil.org
www.iotil.org
www.oitil.org
www.iil.org
www.iril.org
www.itril.org
www.irtil.org
www.ifil.org
www.itfil.org
www.iftil.org
www.igil.org
www.itgil.org
www.igtil.org
www.iyil.org
www.ityil.org
www.iytil.org
www.itl.org
www.itul.org
www.itiul.org
www.ituil.org
www.itjl.org
www.itijl.org
www.itjil.org
www.itkl.org
www.itikl.org
www.itkil.org
www.itol.org
www.itiol.org
www.itoil.org
www.iti.org
www.itip.org
www.itilp.org
www.itipl.org
www.itio.org
www.itilo.org
www.itik.org
www.itilk.org
itil.org Ping
Ping is a computer network administration software utility used to test the reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. It measures the round-trip time for messages sent from the originating host to a destination computer that are echoed back to the source.
itil.org TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a computer network diagnostic tool for displaying the route (path) and measuring transit delays of packets across an Internet Protocol (IP) network. The history of the route is recorded as the round-trip times of the packets received from each successive host (remote node) in the route (path); the sum of the mean times in each hop is a measure of the total time spent to establish the connection. Traceroute proceeds unless all (three) sent packets are lost more than twice, then the connection is lost and the route cannot be evaluated.