geoblog.pl Website Information
Daily Unique Visits: 32,629
Daily Page Views: 195,774
Income Per Day: $392
Estimated Value: $282,240
This website is located in Poland and is using following IP address 77.79.233.90. See the complete list of popular websites hosted in Poland.
geoblog.pl is registered under .PL top-level domain. Please check other sites in .PL zone.
Website geoblog.pl is using the following name servers:
- ns1.netventure.pl
- ns4.netventure.pl
- ns2.netventure.pl
- ns3.netventure.pl
and is probably hosted by ATM S.A.. See the full list of other websites hosted by ATM S.A..
The highest website geoblog.pl position in Alexa rank database was 43778 and the lowest rank position was 999578. Current position of geoblog.pl in Alexa rank database is 43955.
Desktop speed score of geoblog.pl (67/100) is better than the results of 45.93% of other sites and shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
Mobile usability score of geoblog.pl (61/100) is better than the results of 5.47% of other sites and means that the page is not mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed score of geoblog.pl (59/100) is better than the results of 52.41% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Advertisement
geoblog.pl Alexa Rank
The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and is a combined measure of page views and users.
geoblog.pl whois
WHOIS gives you the ability to lookup any generic domains to find out the registered domain holder. WHOIS database are provided for information purposes only. It allows the public to check whether a specific domain name is still available or not and to obtain information related to the registration records of existing domain names.
geoblog.pl server information
Servers Location
geoblog.pl desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-01-13
geoblog.pl Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 34Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 333.5KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing http://joael.geoblog.pl/gallery/79504/thumb_8f39c9c3e769.JPG could save 30.6KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://matmax.geoblog.pl/gallery/79593/thumb_d52dd9c8afd6.jpg could save 29.6KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://tomaga.geoblog.pl/gallery/79592/thumb_f6b1616cbceb.jpg could save 27.6KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://joael.geoblog.pl/gallery/79504/thumb_183fa32367d8.JPG could save 25.1KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://tomaga.geoblog.pl/gallery/79592/thumb_715da9fd96c6.jpg could save 22.4KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing http://matmax.geoblog.pl/gallery/79593/thumb_468a9a61be70.jpg could save 20.7KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://joael.geoblog.pl/gallery/79453/thumb_ddfdb0d6d6df.jpg could save 19.2KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://joael.geoblog.pl/gallery/79453/thumb_eaa52f410fb4.jpg could save 19.1KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing http://matmax.geoblog.pl/gallery/79593/thumb_8b884eb54ce1.jpg could save 18.4KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://joael.geoblog.pl/gallery/79453/thumb_27b56853e666.jpg could save 16.5KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://tomaga.geoblog.pl/gallery/79592/thumb_b2964a9c87d7.jpg could save 14.8KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/yH/r/ymaruJl2Pjp.png could save 8.6KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/content/polecane/promowany_blog24.jpg could save 6.9KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/yX/r/Kvo5FesWVKX.png could save 6.8KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://louis.geoblog.pl/3db73c76e559.jpg could save 5.1KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing http://joael.geoblog.pl/028af8c3daac.jpg could save 5KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing http://matmax.geoblog.pl/e2b71202f1ed.jpg could save 4.2KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_bg_guy_bottom.jpg could save 4KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icons/icon_star_gryel.png could save 2.7KiB (93% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icons/icon_star_full.png could save 2.7KiB (93% reduction).
Compressing http://mamama.geoblog.pl/cede6ec94ae9.jpg could save 2.6KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/geoblog_avatar.jpg could save 1.2KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_bg_guy_top.jpg could save 909B (28% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_bg_body.gif could save 702B (81% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_login.gif could save 678B (52% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/button_szukaj.gif could save 472B (32% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/button_zaloguj.gif could save 471B (31% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_entry_m.gif could save 469B (45% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_comment_m.gif could save 448B (42% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_stats.gif could save 444B (40% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_rss.gif could save 418B (39% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent-mia3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-1/p50x…19d46a94e2&oe=5CBF9F94 could save 400B (25% reduction).
Compressing http://przedsiebie.geoblog.pl/eb906a02994a_img.jpg could save 382B (32% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_uzytkownicy_footer.gif could save 294B (27% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_multimedia_footer.gif could save 262B (24% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_podroze_footer.gif could save 249B (22% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_zdjecia_footer.gif could save 233B (21% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_photo_m.gif could save 209B (18% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_search_input_left.gif could save 202B (40% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_checkbox.gif could save 200B (29% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_media_m.gif could save 196B (17% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_kml.gif could save 179B (17% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/bullet_arrow_footer.gif could save 174B (33% reduction).
priority - 8Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 1 second.
priority - 6Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 3 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://geoblog.pl/style/javascripts/jquery.default.form.values.js
http://geoblog.pl/style/javascripts/jquery.cycle.all.min.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://geoblog.pl/style/css/content.css
priority - 1Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
priority - 0Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 668B (13% reduction).
Minifying http://geoblog.pl/style/css/basics.css could save 284B (16% reduction) after compression.
geoblog.pl Desktop Resource Breakdown
Total Resources | 118 |
Number of Hosts | 16 |
Static Resources | 110 |
JavaScript Resources | 30 |
CSS Resources | 7 |
geoblog.pl mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-01-13
geoblog.pl Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 34Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 333.5KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing http://joael.geoblog.pl/gallery/79504/thumb_8f39c9c3e769.JPG could save 30.6KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://matmax.geoblog.pl/gallery/79593/thumb_d52dd9c8afd6.jpg could save 29.6KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://tomaga.geoblog.pl/gallery/79592/thumb_f6b1616cbceb.jpg could save 27.6KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://joael.geoblog.pl/gallery/79504/thumb_183fa32367d8.JPG could save 25.1KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://tomaga.geoblog.pl/gallery/79592/thumb_715da9fd96c6.jpg could save 22.4KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing http://matmax.geoblog.pl/gallery/79593/thumb_468a9a61be70.jpg could save 20.7KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://joael.geoblog.pl/gallery/79453/thumb_ddfdb0d6d6df.jpg could save 19.2KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://joael.geoblog.pl/gallery/79453/thumb_eaa52f410fb4.jpg could save 19.1KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing http://matmax.geoblog.pl/gallery/79593/thumb_8b884eb54ce1.jpg could save 18.4KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://joael.geoblog.pl/gallery/79453/thumb_27b56853e666.jpg could save 16.5KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://tomaga.geoblog.pl/gallery/79592/thumb_b2964a9c87d7.jpg could save 14.8KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/yH/r/ymaruJl2Pjp.png could save 8.6KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/content/polecane/promowany_blog24.jpg could save 6.9KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/yX/r/Kvo5FesWVKX.png could save 6.8KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://louis.geoblog.pl/3db73c76e559.jpg could save 5.1KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing http://joael.geoblog.pl/028af8c3daac.jpg could save 5KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing http://matmax.geoblog.pl/e2b71202f1ed.jpg could save 4.2KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_bg_guy_bottom.jpg could save 4KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icons/icon_star_gryel.png could save 2.7KiB (93% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icons/icon_star_full.png could save 2.7KiB (93% reduction).
Compressing http://mamama.geoblog.pl/cede6ec94ae9.jpg could save 2.6KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/geoblog_avatar.jpg could save 1.2KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_bg_guy_top.jpg could save 909B (28% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_bg_body.gif could save 702B (81% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_login.gif could save 678B (52% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/button_szukaj.gif could save 472B (32% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/button_zaloguj.gif could save 471B (31% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_entry_m.gif could save 469B (45% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_comment_m.gif could save 448B (42% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_stats.gif could save 444B (40% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_rss.gif could save 418B (39% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent-mia3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-1/p50x…19d46a94e2&oe=5CBF9F94 could save 400B (25% reduction).
Compressing http://przedsiebie.geoblog.pl/eb906a02994a_img.jpg could save 382B (32% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_uzytkownicy_footer.gif could save 294B (27% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_multimedia_footer.gif could save 262B (24% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_podroze_footer.gif could save 249B (22% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_zdjecia_footer.gif could save 233B (21% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_photo_m.gif could save 209B (18% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_search_input_left.gif could save 202B (40% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/design_checkbox.gif could save 200B (29% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_media_m.gif could save 196B (17% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/icon_kml.gif could save 179B (17% reduction).
Compressing http://geoblog.pl/style/images/bullet_arrow_footer.gif could save 174B (33% reduction).
priority - 24Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 3 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://geoblog.pl/style/javascripts/jquery.default.form.values.js
http://geoblog.pl/style/javascripts/jquery.cycle.all.min.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://geoblog.pl/style/css/content.css
priority - 12Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 1 second.
priority - 2Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
priority - 0Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 668B (13% reduction).
Minifying http://geoblog.pl/style/css/basics.css could save 284B (16% reduction) after compression.
geoblog.pl Mobile Resource Breakdown
Total Resources | 116 |
Number of Hosts | 16 |
Static Resources | 108 |
JavaScript Resources | 28 |
CSS Resources | 7 |
geoblog.pl mobile page usability
Last tested: 2019-01-13
geoblog.pl Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 39Use legible font sizes
The following text on your page renders in a way that may be difficult for some of your visitors to read. Use legible font sizes to provide a better user experience.
The following text fragments have a small font size. Increase the font size to make them more legible.
. Warunki prze…przeglądarce.
and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).polityką prywatności
renders only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).Użytkownicy
and 3 others render only 5 pixels tall (13 CSS pixels).Załóż konto
and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (13 CSS pixels).zapamiętaj
renders only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).Zapomniałem hasła
renders only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).Chcesz mieć swój blog
and 2 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).Zarejestruj sie tutaj !
renders only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).Podziel się doświadczeniami
renders only 7 pixels tall (19 CSS pixels).Opisz swoją po…nazwy miejsc,
and 7 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).Nasi blogerzy…chali łącznie:
and 6 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).90.877.940
and 4 others render only 6 pixels tall (15 CSS pixels).przedsiebie
and 6 others render only 5 pixels tall (13 CSS pixels).Gorąca prośba…podpowiedzi...
and 6 others render only 6 pixels tall (16 CSS pixels).0 multimediów
and 27 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).więcej ostatni…wanych podróży
and 5 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).27 dni temu
and 4 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).Australia
and 7 others render only 4 pixels tall (10 CSS pixels).Stany Zjednoczone
and 5 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).Francja
and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (13 CSS pixels).Słowacja
and 3 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).Hiszpania
and 1 others render only 6 pixels tall (16 CSS pixels).Niemcy
renders only 7 pixels tall (17 CSS pixels).Wielka Brytania
renders only 6 pixels tall (15 CSS pixels).Blog ekipy Geoblog Sp. z o.o.
renders only 6 pixels tall (16 CSS pixels).geoblog.geoblog.pl
and 2 others render only 5 pixels tall (13 CSS pixels).Trzymaj rękę na pulsie
renders only 5 pixels tall (13 CSS pixels).20.03.2013
and 2 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).Rusza jubileus…oły w Krakowie
and 2 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).Geoblog.pl
renders only 7 pixels tall (18 CSS pixels).5740 polubienia
renders only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).Polub tę stronę
renders only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).Zarejestruj się
renders only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).Bądź pierwszą…tóra to polubi
renders only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).968.031
and 3 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).Multimediów
and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).Załóż konto
renders only 6 pixels tall (15 CSS pixels).Polityka prywatności i cookies
and 5 others render only 5 pixels tall (13 CSS pixels).All rights res…by Netventure
and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (13 CSS pixels).priority - 17Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="http://www.geoblog.pl/wizy">Wizy</a>
is close to 1 other tap targets.<input type="text" name="userLogin" class="login">
is close to 1 other tap targets.<input type="password" name="userPassword" class="password noVal">
is close to 3 other tap targets.<input type="image" name="zaloguj" class="zaloguj">
is close to 2 other tap targets.<label id="zapamietajLabel" for="zapamietaj">zapamiętaj</label>
is close to 2 other tap targets.<a href="/przypomnienie-hasla">Zapomniałem hasła</a>
is close to 1 other tap targets.<a href="http://louis.geoblog.pl/"></a>
and 6 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://louis.geoblog.pl/">louis</a>
and 6 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://louis.g…/rss/26331.xml"></a>
and 13 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://joael.g…8-izrael-egipt">2018-Izrael-Egipt</a>
and 1 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://tracy.geoblog.pl/">27 dni temu</a>
and 4 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://tracy.geoblog.pl/">Tracy</a>
and 4 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://tracy.geoblog.pl/"></a>
and 7 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://louis.g…ius-port-louis"></a>
and 14 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="/podroze/australia">Australia</a>
and 7 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="/podroze/chorwacja">Chorwacja</a>
and 5 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="/podroze/francja">Francja</a>
and 1 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="/podroze/grecja">Grecja</a>
and 3 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="/podroze/hiszpania">Hiszpania</a>
and 1 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="/podroze/niemcy">Niemcy</a>
is close to 2 other tap targets.<a href="/podroze/polska">Polska</a>
is close to 7 other tap targets.<a href="/podroze/wielka-brytania">Wielka Brytania</a>
is close to 2 other tap targets.<a href="http://geoblog…oly-w-krakowie">20.03.2013</a>
and 2 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://geoblog…oly-w-krakowie">Rusza jubileus…oły w Krakowie</a>
and 2 others are close to other tap targets.<img src="https://sconte…e2&oe=5CBF9F94" class="_1drn _-s img">
is close to 1 other tap targets.<a href="http://www.geo…pl/uzytkownicy">Użytkowników</a>
and 1 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://www.geoblog.pl/onas">O Geoblogu</a>
and 5 others are close to other tap targets.priority - 10Configure the viewport
Your page does not have a viewport specified. This causes mobile devices to render your page as it would appear on a desktop browser, scaling it down to fit on a mobile screen. Configure a viewport to allow your page to render properly on all devices.
geoblog.pl HTML validation
Errors
Almost standards mode doctype. Expected “<!DOCTYPE html>”.
"...<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html ..."
When the attribute “xml:lang” in no namespace is specified, the element must also have the attribute “lang” present with the same value.
"...onal.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="pl"><head>..."
Attribute “value” not allowed on element “input” at this point.
"... alt="" /><input type="image" name="szukaj" src="/style/images/button_szukaj.gif" value="Szukaj" class="szukaj"/></form..." Line: 1 Column: 4981 - 5087
"...rd"/><div><input type="image" name="zaloguj" src="/style/images/button_zaloguj.gif" value="Zaloguj" class="zaloguj"/><input..."
Element “input” is missing required attribute “alt”.
"... alt="" /><input type="image" name="szukaj" src="/style/images/button_szukaj.gif" value="Szukaj" class="szukaj"/></form..." Line: 1 Column: 4981 - 5087
"...rd"/><div><input type="image" name="zaloguj" src="/style/images/button_zaloguj.gif" value="Zaloguj" class="zaloguj"/><input..."
An “img” element must have an “alt” attribute, except under certain conditions. For details, consult guidance on providing text alternatives for images.
"...: -10px;"><img style="position: relative; top: 5px; margin-right: 10px;" src="/style/images/icon_wiecej.png" /><a hre..."
No space between attributes.
"...ext/javascript"src="http://pag..."
The “scrolling” attribute on the “iframe” element is obsolete. Use CSS instead.
"...ook"><div><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/likebox.php?id=170960878053&width=320&locale=pl_PL&height=220&connections=5&stream=false&header=true" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:320px; height:220px"></ifra..."
The “frameborder” attribute on the “iframe” element is obsolete. Use CSS instead.
"...ook"><div><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/likebox.php?id=170960878053&width=320&locale=pl_PL&height=220&connections=5&stream=false&header=true" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:320px; height:220px"></ifra..."
geoblog.pl similar domains
www.geoblog.net
www.geoblog.org
www.geoblog.info
www.geoblog.biz
www.geoblog.us
www.geoblog.mobi
www.eoblog.pl
www.geoblog.pl
www.feoblog.pl
www.gfeoblog.pl
www.fgeoblog.pl
www.veoblog.pl
www.gveoblog.pl
www.vgeoblog.pl
www.teoblog.pl
www.gteoblog.pl
www.tgeoblog.pl
www.beoblog.pl
www.gbeoblog.pl
www.bgeoblog.pl
www.yeoblog.pl
www.gyeoblog.pl
www.ygeoblog.pl
www.heoblog.pl
www.gheoblog.pl
www.hgeoblog.pl
www.goblog.pl
www.gwoblog.pl
www.gewoblog.pl
www.gweoblog.pl
www.gsoblog.pl
www.gesoblog.pl
www.gseoblog.pl
www.gdoblog.pl
www.gedoblog.pl
www.gdeoblog.pl
www.groblog.pl
www.geroblog.pl
www.greoblog.pl
www.geblog.pl
www.geiblog.pl
www.geoiblog.pl
www.geioblog.pl
www.gekblog.pl
www.geokblog.pl
www.gekoblog.pl
www.gelblog.pl
www.geolblog.pl
www.geloblog.pl
www.gepblog.pl
www.geopblog.pl
www.gepoblog.pl
www.geolog.pl
www.geovlog.pl
www.geobvlog.pl
www.geovblog.pl
www.geoglog.pl
www.geobglog.pl
www.geogblog.pl
www.geohlog.pl
www.geobhlog.pl
www.geohblog.pl
www.geonlog.pl
www.geobnlog.pl
www.geonblog.pl
www.geobog.pl
www.geobpog.pl
www.geoblpog.pl
www.geobplog.pl
www.geoboog.pl
www.geobloog.pl
www.geobolog.pl
www.geobkog.pl
www.geoblkog.pl
www.geobklog.pl
www.geoblg.pl
www.geoblig.pl
www.geobloig.pl
www.geobliog.pl
www.geoblkg.pl
www.geoblokg.pl
www.geobllg.pl
www.geoblolg.pl
www.geobllog.pl
www.geoblpg.pl
www.geoblopg.pl
www.geoblo.pl
www.geoblof.pl
www.geoblogf.pl
www.geoblofg.pl
www.geoblov.pl
www.geoblogv.pl
www.geoblovg.pl
www.geoblot.pl
www.geoblogt.pl
www.geoblotg.pl
www.geoblob.pl
www.geoblogb.pl
www.geoblobg.pl
www.geobloy.pl
www.geoblogy.pl
www.geobloyg.pl
www.geobloh.pl
www.geoblogh.pl
www.geoblohg.pl
geoblog.pl Ping
Ping is a computer network administration software utility used to test the reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. It measures the round-trip time for messages sent from the originating host to a destination computer that are echoed back to the source.
geoblog.pl TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a computer network diagnostic tool for displaying the route (path) and measuring transit delays of packets across an Internet Protocol (IP) network. The history of the route is recorded as the round-trip times of the packets received from each successive host (remote node) in the route (path); the sum of the mean times in each hop is a measure of the total time spent to establish the connection. Traceroute proceeds unless all (three) sent packets are lost more than twice, then the connection is lost and the route cannot be evaluated.