EUROPEANREVIEW.ORG European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences

europeanreview.org Website Information

Daily Unique Visits: 32,526

Daily Page Views: 195,156

Income Per Day: $390

Estimated Value: $280,800

This website is located in Italy and is using following IP address 46.30.244.130. See the complete list of popular websites hosted in Italy.

europeanreview.org is registered under .ORG top-level domain. Please check other sites in .ORG zone.

Website europeanreview.org is using the following name servers:

  • ns2.dnshigh.com
  • ns1.dnshigh.com

and is probably hosted by Server Plan S.r.l.. See the full list of other websites hosted by Server Plan S.r.l..

The highest website europeanreview.org position in Alexa rank database was 21628 and the lowest rank position was 995641. Current position of europeanreview.org in Alexa rank database is 44095.

Desktop speed score of europeanreview.org (72/100) is better than the results of 54.39% of other sites and shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

Mobile usability score of europeanreview.org (97/100) is better than the results of 49.9% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed score of europeanreview.org (50/100) is better than the results of 33.92% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Advertisement

europeanreview.org Alexa Rank

The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and is a combined measure of page views and users.


europeanreview.org whois

WHOIS gives you the ability to lookup any generic domains to find out the registered domain holder. WHOIS database are provided for information purposes only. It allows the public to check whether a specific domain name is still available or not and to obtain information related to the registration records of existing domain names.


Domain Name: EUROPEANREVIEW.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D106418415-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: http://whois.serverplan.com
Registrar URL: http://www.serverplan.com
Updated Date: 2021-05-25T01:31:15Z
Creation Date: 2005-05-24T08:30:26Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-05-24T08:30:26Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: Server Plan Srl Unipersonale
Registrar IANA ID: 1460
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@serverplan.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +39.0776392424
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registrant Organization: Verduci Editore
Registrant State/Province: RM
Registrant Country: IT
Name Server: NS1.DNSHIGH.COM
Name Server: NS2.DNSHIGH.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form https://www.icann.org/wicf/)
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2022-04-02T17:36:06Z

europeanreview.org server information

Servers Location

europeanreview.org desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2015-10-14


Desktop Speed Medium
72/100

europeanreview.org Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 20Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 194.9KiB (72% reduction).

Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…query.min.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 59.7KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…undation.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 49.6KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/ could save 31KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…bit-1.4.0.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 15.3KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-includes/js/wp…lease.min.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 10.1KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/style.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 7.5KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…stomforms.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 5.6KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ry.reveal.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 4.6KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes….tooltips.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 4.3KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…oundation.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 3.5KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/js/app.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 2.8KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…older.min.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 952B (58% reduction).

priority - 8Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 2 blocking script resources and 6 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…query.min.js?ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…oundation.js?ver=4.2.5

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugin…e/widget.css?ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…undation.css?ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…/css/app.css?ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/style.css?ver=4.2.5
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans%3…%2C400%2C300&ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugin…tyle/wpp.css?ver=3.2.2

priority - 4Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…rie/images/divider.png (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/EUR-REV5.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/upload…2/09/background-v2.png (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/certificate.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/cover.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/lolo-c4.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/wcrj.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)

priority - 3Reduce server response time

priority - 2Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 14.6KiB (34% reduction).

Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…bit-1.4.0.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 7.2KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ry.reveal.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 2.2KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…stomforms.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 1.8KiB (26% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes….tooltips.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 1.8KiB (31% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/js/app.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 1.5KiB (37% reduction).

priority - 1Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 14.2KiB (20% reduction).

Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…undation.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 10.1KiB (17% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/style.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 2.9KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugin…tyle/wpp.css?ver=3.2.2 could save 608B (68% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…/css/app.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 548B (84% reduction).

priority - 1Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 6.2KiB (14% reduction).

Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…rie/images/divider.png could save 2.8KiB (95% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/EUR-REV5.gif could save 1.2KiB (11% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/cover.jpg could save 911B (7% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/wcrj.jpg could save 844B (12% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/lolo-c4.jpg could save 542B (5% reduction).

priority - 0Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 4.7KiB (12% reduction).

Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/ could save 4.7KiB (12% reduction).

europeanreview.org Desktop Resource Breakdown

Total Resources26
Number of Hosts4
Static Resources9
JavaScript Resources10
CSS Resources6

europeanreview.org mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-08-13


Mobile Speed Bad
50/100

europeanreview.org Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 40Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 3 blocking script resources and 6 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…uery.min.js?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…undation.js?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…4.2.0.min.js?ver=4.2.2

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/widget.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…ndation.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…css/app.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/style.css?ver=4.9.10
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans%…2C400%2C300&ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/css/wpp.css?ver=4.2.2

priority - 34Avoid landing page redirects

Your page has 2 redirects. Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.

Avoid landing page redirects for the following chain of redirected URLs.

http://europeanreview.org/
https://europeanreview.org/
https://www.europeanreview.org/

priority - 21Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 206.2KiB (72% reduction).

Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…uery.min.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 59.8KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…ndation.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 49.6KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/ could save 42.2KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…it-1.4.0.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 15.3KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/style.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 7.6KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-includes/js/w…ease.min.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 7.5KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…tomforms.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 5.6KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…y.reveal.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 4.6KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…tooltips.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 4.3KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…undation.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 3.5KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/js/app.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 2.8KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…lder.min.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 952B (58% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/css/wpp.css?ver=4.2.2 could save 686B (56% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 650B (47% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…4.2.0.min.js?ver=4.2.2 could save 566B (50% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…css/app.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 446B (69% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/widget.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 387B (50% reduction).

priority - 7Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…rie/images/divider.png (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/EUR-REV5.gif (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…2/09/background-v2.png (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…ver-new-IF-225x300.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/certificate.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…-logo-625w-300x300.png (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/lolo-c4.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/wcrj.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://ssl.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)

priority - 3Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 30.5KiB (38% reduction).

Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…ver-new-IF-225x300.jpg could save 11.9KiB (49% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…-logo-625w-300x300.png could save 6.6KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/lolo-c4.jpg could save 6.2KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…rie/images/divider.png could save 2.6KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/wcrj.jpg could save 2.1KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/certificate.jpg could save 1.1KiB (15% reduction).

priority - 3Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.40 seconds.

priority - 1Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 14.6KiB (20% reduction).

Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…ndation.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 10.1KiB (17% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/style.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 2.9KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/css/wpp.css?ver=4.2.2 could save 853B (70% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…css/app.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 548B (84% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/widget.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 151B (20% reduction).

priority - 1Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 14.6KiB (34% reduction).

Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…it-1.4.0.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 7.2KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…y.reveal.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 2.2KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…tomforms.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 1.8KiB (26% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…tooltips.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 1.8KiB (31% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/js/app.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 1.5KiB (37% reduction).

priority - 1Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 8.2KiB (16% reduction).

Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/ could save 8.2KiB (16% reduction).

europeanreview.org Mobile Resource Breakdown

Total Resources30
Number of Hosts4
Static Resources10
JavaScript Resources12
CSS Resources6

europeanreview.org mobile page usability

Last tested: 2019-08-13


Mobile Usability Good
97/100

europeanreview.org Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 3Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <a href="https://www.eu…ic/allergology">Allergology</a> and 67 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="http://scienti…pean%20review*">Current Conten…nical Medicine</a> and 4 others are close to other tap targets.

europeanreview.org HTML validation

Errors

Bad value “https://api.w.org/” for attribute “rel” on element “link”: The string “https://api.w.org/” is not a registered keyword.

Line: 83 Column: 1 - 80
"...</script> <link rel='https://api.w.org/' href='https://www.europeanreview.org/wp-json/' /> <link..."

An “img” element must have an “alt” attribute, except under certain conditions. For details, consult guidance on providing text alternatives for images.

Line: 271 Column: 9 - 112
"...> <figure><img class="alignleft" src="https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/Riv-eur-225x300.jpg" /></figu..."

Warnings

The “banner” role is unnecessary for element “header”.

Line: 100 Column: 4 - 48
"..."row"> <header class="twelve columns" role="banner"> <..."

The “navigation” role is unnecessary for element “nav”.

Line: 106 Column: 5 - 27
".../div> <nav role="navigation"> ..."

The “complementary” role is unnecessary for element “aside”.

Line: 120 Column: 1 - 68
"...ss="row"> <aside id="sidebar-left" class="three columns" role="complementary"> <div..." Line: 903 Column: 3 - 65
"... --> <aside id="sidebar" class="three columns" role="complementary"> <div..."

The “list” role is unnecessary for element “ul”.

Line: 929 Column: 211 - 247
"...agscloud"><ul class='wp-tag-cloud' role='list'> <li>..."

Article lacks heading. Consider using “h2”-“h6” elements to add identifying headings to all articles.

Line: 944 Column: 23 - 74
"...</article><article id="text-8" class="row widget widget_text"><div c..." Line: 985 Column: 1 - 52
".../article> <article id="text-5" class="row widget widget_text"><div c..." Line: 987 Column: 19 - 70
"...</article><article id="text-6" class="row widget widget_text"><div c..."

The “contentinfo” role is unnecessary for element “footer”.

Line: 996 Column: 3 - 47
"... --> <footer id="content-info" role="contentinfo"> <d..."

europeanreview.org similar domains

Similar domains:
www.europeanreview.com
www.europeanreview.net
www.europeanreview.org
www.europeanreview.info
www.europeanreview.biz
www.europeanreview.us
www.europeanreview.mobi
www.uropeanreview.org
www.europeanreview.org
www.wuropeanreview.org
www.ewuropeanreview.org
www.weuropeanreview.org
www.suropeanreview.org
www.esuropeanreview.org
www.seuropeanreview.org
www.duropeanreview.org
www.eduropeanreview.org
www.deuropeanreview.org
www.ruropeanreview.org
www.eruropeanreview.org
www.reuropeanreview.org
www.eropeanreview.org
www.eyropeanreview.org
www.euyropeanreview.org
www.eyuropeanreview.org
www.ehropeanreview.org
www.euhropeanreview.org
www.ehuropeanreview.org
www.ejropeanreview.org
www.eujropeanreview.org
www.ejuropeanreview.org
www.eiropeanreview.org
www.euiropeanreview.org
www.eiuropeanreview.org
www.euopeanreview.org
www.eueopeanreview.org
www.eureopeanreview.org
www.eueropeanreview.org
www.eudopeanreview.org
www.eurdopeanreview.org
www.eudropeanreview.org
www.eufopeanreview.org
www.eurfopeanreview.org
www.eufropeanreview.org
www.eutopeanreview.org
www.eurtopeanreview.org
www.eutropeanreview.org
www.eurpeanreview.org
www.euripeanreview.org
www.euroipeanreview.org
www.euriopeanreview.org
www.eurkpeanreview.org
www.eurokpeanreview.org
www.eurkopeanreview.org
www.eurlpeanreview.org
www.eurolpeanreview.org
www.eurlopeanreview.org
www.eurppeanreview.org
www.europpeanreview.org
www.eurpopeanreview.org
www.euroeanreview.org
www.eurooeanreview.org
www.europoeanreview.org
www.euroopeanreview.org
www.euroleanreview.org
www.europleanreview.org
www.europanreview.org
www.europwanreview.org
www.europewanreview.org
www.europweanreview.org
www.europsanreview.org
www.europesanreview.org
www.europseanreview.org
www.europdanreview.org
www.europedanreview.org
www.europdeanreview.org
www.europranreview.org
www.europeranreview.org
www.europreanreview.org
www.europenreview.org
www.europeqnreview.org
www.europeaqnreview.org
www.europeqanreview.org
www.europewnreview.org
www.europeawnreview.org
www.europesnreview.org
www.europeasnreview.org
www.europeznreview.org
www.europeaznreview.org
www.europezanreview.org
www.europeareview.org
www.europeabreview.org
www.europeanbreview.org
www.europeabnreview.org
www.europeahreview.org
www.europeanhreview.org
www.europeahnreview.org
www.europeajreview.org
www.europeanjreview.org
www.europeajnreview.org
www.europeamreview.org
www.europeanmreview.org
www.europeamnreview.org
www.europeaneview.org
www.europeaneeview.org
www.europeanreeview.org
www.europeanereview.org
www.europeandeview.org
www.europeanrdeview.org
www.europeandreview.org
www.europeanfeview.org
www.europeanrfeview.org
www.europeanfreview.org
www.europeanteview.org
www.europeanrteview.org
www.europeantreview.org
www.europeanrview.org
www.europeanrwview.org
www.europeanrewview.org
www.europeanrweview.org
www.europeanrsview.org
www.europeanresview.org
www.europeanrseview.org
www.europeanrdview.org
www.europeanredview.org
www.europeanrrview.org
www.europeanrerview.org
www.europeanrreview.org
www.europeanreiew.org
www.europeanreciew.org
www.europeanrevciew.org
www.europeanrecview.org
www.europeanrefiew.org
www.europeanrevfiew.org
www.europeanrefview.org
www.europeanregiew.org
www.europeanrevgiew.org
www.europeanregview.org
www.europeanrebiew.org
www.europeanrevbiew.org
www.europeanrebview.org
www.europeanrevew.org
www.europeanrevuew.org
www.europeanreviuew.org
www.europeanrevuiew.org
www.europeanrevjew.org
www.europeanrevijew.org
www.europeanrevjiew.org
www.europeanrevkew.org
www.europeanrevikew.org
www.europeanrevkiew.org
www.europeanrevoew.org
www.europeanrevioew.org
www.europeanrevoiew.org
www.europeanreviw.org
www.europeanreviww.org
www.europeanrevieww.org
www.europeanreviwew.org
www.europeanrevisw.org
www.europeanreviesw.org
www.europeanrevisew.org
www.europeanrevidw.org
www.europeanreviedw.org
www.europeanrevidew.org
www.europeanrevirw.org
www.europeanrevierw.org
www.europeanrevirew.org
www.europeanrevie.org
www.europeanrevieq.org
www.europeanreviewq.org
www.europeanrevieqw.org
www.europeanreviea.org
www.europeanreviewa.org
www.europeanrevieaw.org
www.europeanrevies.org
www.europeanreviews.org
www.europeanreviee.org
www.europeanreviewe.org
www.europeanrevieew.org

europeanreview.org Ping

Ping is a computer network administration software utility used to test the reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. It measures the round-trip time for messages sent from the originating host to a destination computer that are echoed back to the source.


europeanreview.org TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a computer network diagnostic tool for displaying the route (path) and measuring transit delays of packets across an Internet Protocol (IP) network. The history of the route is recorded as the round-trip times of the packets received from each successive host (remote node) in the route (path); the sum of the mean times in each hop is a measure of the total time spent to establish the connection. Traceroute proceeds unless all (three) sent packets are lost more than twice, then the connection is lost and the route cannot be evaluated.