etracker.de Website Information
Daily Unique Visits: 155,211
Daily Page Views: 1,241,688
Income Per Day: $1,242
Estimated Value: $1,341,360
This website is located in Germany and is using following IP address 62.201.164.117. See the complete list of popular websites hosted in Germany.
etracker.de is registered under .DE top-level domain. Please check other sites in .DE zone.
Website etracker.de is using the following name servers:
- ns3.iphh.net
- ns2.iphh.de
- ns1.iphh.de
and is probably hosted by IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH. See the full list of other websites hosted by IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH.
The highest website etracker.de position in Alexa rank database was 7877 and the lowest rank position was 992424. Current position of etracker.de in Alexa rank database is 9818.
Desktop speed score of etracker.de (81/100) is better than the results of 71.91% of other sites and shows that the page is performing great on desktop computers.
Mobile usability score of etracker.de (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed score of etracker.de (66/100) is better than the results of 68.49% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Advertisement
etracker.de Alexa Rank
The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and is a combined measure of page views and users.
etracker.de whois
WHOIS gives you the ability to lookup any generic domains to find out the registered domain holder. WHOIS database are provided for information purposes only. It allows the public to check whether a specific domain name is still available or not and to obtain information related to the registration records of existing domain names.
Status: connect
etracker.de server information
Servers Location
etracker.de desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-06-27
etracker.de Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 10Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 4 blocking script resources and 13 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://www.etracker.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
https://www.etracker.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jqu…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://static.etracker.com/code/e.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://www.etracker.com/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/plugins/captch…op_style.css?ver=4.4.5
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/plugins/sitepr…-click/style.css?ver=1
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/plugins/sitepr…rtical/style.css?ver=1
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…w/style.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracker-new/css/page.css
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…sidebar.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…s/forms.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…omplete.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…dor.min.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…/footer.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/plugins/tablep…efault.min.css?ver=1.9
priority - 8Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 74.3KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/uploads/img/logo.png could save 645B (32% reduction).
Compressing https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/uploads/img/logo_white.png could save 274B (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/uploads/img/logo_grey.png could save 265B (17% reduction).
priority - 2Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://application.etracker.com/dc/js/smartmessaging.js?_=1561678549932 (60 minutes)
https://application.etracker.com/dc/js/smartmessaging.js?_=1561678549933 (60 minutes)
https://www.etracker.de/dc/js/jquery-1.8.3.min.js (60 minutes)
https://static.etracker.com/code/e.js (4 hours)
priority - 1Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 6.1KiB (34% reduction).
Minifying https://application.etracker.com/dc/js/smartmessaging.js?_=1561678549933 could save 3KiB (34% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/plugins/sitepr…-click/script.js?ver=1 could save 121B (19% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.9KiB (35% reduction).
Minifying https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…sidebar.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 278B (18% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…w/style.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 229B (84% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…/footer.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 212B (38% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/plugins/captch…nd_style.css?ver=4.4.5 could save 163B (23% reduction) after compression.
etracker.de Desktop Resource Breakdown
Total Resources | 73 |
Number of Hosts | 7 |
Static Resources | 9 |
JavaScript Resources | 19 |
CSS Resources | 14 |
etracker.de mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-12-18
etracker.de Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 40Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 4 blocking script resources and 13 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://www.etracker.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
https://www.etracker.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jqu…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://static.etracker.com/code/e.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://www.etracker.com/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.css?ver=4.9.9
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/plugins/captch…le_style.css?ver=4.4.5
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/plugins/sitepr…-click/style.css?ver=1
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/plugins/sitepr…rtical/style.css?ver=1
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracker-new/style.css?ver=4.9.9
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracker-new/css/page.css
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…/sidebar.css?ver=4.9.9
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…ss/forms.css?ver=4.9.9
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…complete.css?ver=4.9.9
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…ndor.min.css?ver=4.9.9
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…s/footer.css?ver=4.9.9
https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/plugins/tablep…efault.min.css?ver=1.9
priority - 7Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 64.9KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…rivacy_verified@2x.png could save 31.7KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/uploads/img/logo.png could save 645B (32% reduction).
Compressing https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/uploads/img/logo@2x.png could save 366B (11% reduction).
Compressing https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/uploads/img/logo_white.png could save 274B (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/uploads/img/logo_grey.png could save 265B (17% reduction).
priority - 5Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/finnchat-livech…nimize-chat-window.svg (expiration not specified)
https://secure.livechatinc.com/licence/g7223331_15…atic_config&groups=155 (8.5 minutes)
https://secure.livechatinc.com/licence/7223331/v2/…c6c.js?jsonp=__lc_lang (8.7 minutes)
https://resource.finnchat.com/etracker.js (60 minutes)
https://www.etracker.de/dc/js/jquery-1.8.3.min.js (60 minutes)
https://static.etracker.com/code/e.js (4 hours)
https://cdn.livechatinc.com/tracking.js (8 hours)
priority - 1Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.29 seconds.
priority - 0Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 1.4KiB (57% reduction).
Compressing https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/finnchat-livech…nimize-chat-window.svg could save 266B (39% reduction).
priority - 0Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.2KiB (14% reduction).
priority - 0Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 881B (29% reduction).
Minifying https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracker-new/style.css?ver=4.9.9 could save 228B (84% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/themes/etracke…s/footer.css?ver=4.9.9 could save 212B (38% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/plugins/captch…nd_style.css?ver=4.4.5 could save 163B (23% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 672B (12% reduction).
Minifying https://www.etracker.com/wp-content/plugins/sitepr…-click/script.js?ver=1 could save 121B (19% reduction) after compression.
etracker.de Mobile Resource Breakdown
Total Resources | 91 |
Number of Hosts | 10 |
Static Resources | 12 |
JavaScript Resources | 24 |
CSS Resources | 13 |
etracker.de mobile page usability
Last tested: 2018-12-18
etracker.de Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 0Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="#content">Mehr erfahren</a>
is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<button type="button" class="slick-prev slick-arrow"></button>
is close to 2 other tap targets.The tap target
<button type="button" class="slick-next slick-arrow"></button>
is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://www.fa….com/etracker/"></a>
is close to 1 other tap targets.etracker.de HTML validation
Errors
The element “button” must not appear as a descendant of the “a” element.
"..."/login/"><button class="header-popup__button header-popup__login-btn">Login<..." Line: 333 Column: 4 - 39
"...n'))"> <button class="header-cta__inside ">Kosten..." Line: 367 Column: 33 - 56
"...alytics/"><button class="darkBtn">Mehr I..." Line: 411 Column: 33 - 57
"...timiser/"><button class="lightBtn">Mehr I..." Line: 427 Column: 33 - 58
"...nschutz/"><button class="orangeBtn">Mehr I..."
No “li” element in scope but a “li” end tag seen.
".../ul> </li></li> </..."
etracker.de similar domains
www.etracker.net
www.etracker.org
www.etracker.info
www.etracker.biz
www.etracker.us
www.etracker.mobi
www.tracker.de
www.etracker.de
www.wtracker.de
www.ewtracker.de
www.wetracker.de
www.stracker.de
www.estracker.de
www.setracker.de
www.dtracker.de
www.edtracker.de
www.detracker.de
www.rtracker.de
www.ertracker.de
www.retracker.de
www.eracker.de
www.erracker.de
www.etrracker.de
www.efracker.de
www.etfracker.de
www.eftracker.de
www.egracker.de
www.etgracker.de
www.egtracker.de
www.eyracker.de
www.etyracker.de
www.eytracker.de
www.etacker.de
www.eteacker.de
www.etreacker.de
www.eteracker.de
www.etdacker.de
www.etrdacker.de
www.etdracker.de
www.etfacker.de
www.etrfacker.de
www.ettacker.de
www.etrtacker.de
www.ettracker.de
www.etrcker.de
www.etrqcker.de
www.etraqcker.de
www.etrqacker.de
www.etrwcker.de
www.etrawcker.de
www.etrwacker.de
www.etrscker.de
www.etrascker.de
www.etrsacker.de
www.etrzcker.de
www.etrazcker.de
www.etrzacker.de
www.etraker.de
www.etraxker.de
www.etracxker.de
www.etraxcker.de
www.etradker.de
www.etracdker.de
www.etradcker.de
www.etrafker.de
www.etracfker.de
www.etrafcker.de
www.etravker.de
www.etracvker.de
www.etravcker.de
www.etracer.de
www.etracjer.de
www.etrackjer.de
www.etracjker.de
www.etracier.de
www.etrackier.de
www.etraciker.de
www.etracmer.de
www.etrackmer.de
www.etracmker.de
www.etracler.de
www.etrackler.de
www.etraclker.de
www.etracoer.de
www.etrackoer.de
www.etracoker.de
www.etrackr.de
www.etrackwr.de
www.etrackewr.de
www.etrackwer.de
www.etracksr.de
www.etrackesr.de
www.etrackser.de
www.etrackdr.de
www.etrackedr.de
www.etrackder.de
www.etrackrr.de
www.etrackerr.de
www.etrackrer.de
www.etracke.de
www.etrackee.de
www.etrackere.de
www.etrackeer.de
www.etracked.de
www.etrackerd.de
www.etrackef.de
www.etrackerf.de
www.etrackefr.de
www.etracket.de
www.etrackert.de
www.etracketr.de
etracker.de Ping
Ping is a computer network administration software utility used to test the reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. It measures the round-trip time for messages sent from the originating host to a destination computer that are echoed back to the source.
etracker.de TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a computer network diagnostic tool for displaying the route (path) and measuring transit delays of packets across an Internet Protocol (IP) network. The history of the route is recorded as the round-trip times of the packets received from each successive host (remote node) in the route (path); the sum of the mean times in each hop is a measure of the total time spent to establish the connection. Traceroute proceeds unless all (three) sent packets are lost more than twice, then the connection is lost and the route cannot be evaluated.