designweek.co.uk Website Information
Daily Unique Visits: 55,718
Daily Page Views: 334,308
Income Per Day: $669
Estimated Value: $481,680
designweek.co.uk is registered under .UK top-level domain. Please check other sites in .UK zone.
No name server records were found.
and is probably hosted by CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US. See the full list of other websites hosted by CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US.
The highest website designweek.co.uk position in Alexa rank database was 23114 and the lowest rank position was 26147. Current position of designweek.co.uk in Alexa rank database is 25741.
Desktop speed score of designweek.co.uk (16/100) is better than the results of 2.91% of other sites and shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
Mobile usability score of designweek.co.uk (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed score of designweek.co.uk (46/100) is better than the results of 27.13% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Advertisement
designweek.co.uk Alexa Rank
The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and is a combined measure of page views and users.
designweek.co.uk whois
WHOIS gives you the ability to lookup any generic domains to find out the registered domain holder. WHOIS database are provided for information purposes only. It allows the public to check whether a specific domain name is still available or not and to obtain information related to the registration records of existing domain names.
the WHOIS query quota for 167.99.102.248 has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 27 seconds
WHOIS lookup made at 20:27:41 17-Dec-2024
--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2024.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.
designweek.co.uk server information
Servers Location
designweek.co.uk desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2016-11-20
designweek.co.uk Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 355Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 3.4MiB (82% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…-11-16-at-19.37.38.png could save 563.2KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…R_20160913-749x500.jpg could save 162.2KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…ianBridge-1002x500.jpg could save 159.6KiB (93% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…a_Exterior-750x500.jpg could save 151.5KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…f24a704c_o-500x500.jpg could save 144.2KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…nknown-16-887x500.jpeg could save 139.7KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…/Unknown4-882x500.jpeg could save 131.4KiB (93% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…ntity_018b-800x500.jpg could save 128.9KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…RDNER-1497-750x500.jpg could save 125.9KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…8789_LARGE-750x500.jpg could save 112.2KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…raigKarl_1-750x500.jpg could save 109.3KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…159722378_original.jpg could save 105.4KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…bae3766c71-500x500.jpg could save 104.1KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…_LIGHTS_03-721x500.jpg could save 94.6KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…ces_Image4-750x500.jpg could save 85.6KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…YEARPACK_1-797x500.jpg could save 74.1KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…05_2500-px-740x500.jpg could save 51KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…t-10.08.05-200x200.png could save 48.5KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d….11.10_Set-741x500.jpg could save 47.3KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…4646/HiRes-500x500.jpg could save 45.2KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…t-18.42.09-200x200.png could save 44.5KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…EA_Space10-200x200.png could save 42.3KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…ap-Checked-422x500.jpg could save 36.5KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…856/Airbnb-200x200.png could save 30.5KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…HSF_Blog_1-667x500.jpg could save 25.3KiB (88% reduction).
Compressing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…6/Pilbrow-Partners.jpg could save 20KiB (53% reduction).
Compressing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…-Believe-Ideas-Ltd.jpg could save 19KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…112609/Nu-Creative.jpg could save 17.2KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…2016/11/10162222/F.jpg could save 16.7KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…ood-Hotels-200x200.jpg could save 11.7KiB (85% reduction).
priority - 20Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 23 blocking script resources and 8 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://assets.adobedtm.com/e7901bd22e2c2fdba32bf9…5bf463671fa505ecda0.js
https://www.designweek.co.uk/wordpress/wp-includes…y/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/wordpress/wp-includes…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design….js?ver=1.0-1478600972
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design….js?ver=1.0-1478600972
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/plugins/icit-…min.js?ver=-1478600972
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…tvids.min.js?ver=1.0.3
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…modernizr.js?ver=3.3.1
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…slick.min.js?ver=2.0.0
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…direction.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ols/forms.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ustom.min.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…aceholder.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ster-ajax.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ck-config.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…tickybits.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…gles-tabs.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…min.js?ver=-1478600972
https://s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js?ver=2
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/plugins/doubleclick/js/doubleclick.js
https://www.designweek.co.uk/wordpress/wp-includes…embed.min.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/plugins/icit-…js/tabbed.min.js?ver=1
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ss/fonts.css?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ck/slick.css?ver=2.0.0
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…=1478600964-1478600972
https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ignweek/css/global.css
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/plugins/doubl…ck.css?ver=-1478600972
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ch.css?ver=-1478600972
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ck.css?ver=-1478600972
priority - 19Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 183.5KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…slick.min.js?ver=2.0.0 could save 30KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ignweek/css/global.css could save 26.2KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…modernizr.js?ver=3.3.1 could save 9.7KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…tickybits.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 6.7KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ustom.min.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 4.8KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…aceholder.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 3.7KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ss/fonts.css?ver=4.5.4 could save 3KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them….js?ver=1.0-1478600972 could save 2.8KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ck.css?ver=-1478600972 could save 2.3KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ck-config.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 2.3KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…gles-tabs.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 2KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them….js?ver=1.0-1478600972 could save 2KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ch.css?ver=-1478600972 could save 1.7KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ols/forms.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 1.7KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…direction.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 1.5KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…min.js?ver=-1478600972 could save 1.3KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ck/slick.css?ver=2.0.0 could save 1.1KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ster-ajax.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 949B (62% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…tvids.min.js?ver=1.0.3 could save 868B (53% reduction).
priority - 6Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://assets.adobedtm.com/e7901bd22e2c2fdba32bf9…5bf463671fa505ecda0.js (expiration not specified)
https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ignweek/css/global.css (expiration not specified)
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/plugins/doubleclick/js/doubleclick.js (expiration not specified)
https://m.addthisedge.com/live/boost/ra-54eb16d604…_ate.track.config_resp (60 seconds)
https://s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js?ver=2 (10 minutes)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TQFXSV (15 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://aka-cdn.adtech.de/dt/common/DAC.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/lidar.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 3Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 27KiB (20% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ignweek/css/global.css could save 8KiB (24% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ck.css?ver=-1478600972 could save 855B (26% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ss/fonts.css?ver=4.5.4 could save 796B (20% reduction).
priority - 2Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 1Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 13.9KiB (41% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them….js?ver=1.0-1478600972 could save 2.1KiB (50% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…aceholder.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 1.8KiB (35% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…direction.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 1.3KiB (52% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them….js?ver=1.0-1478600972 could save 1.2KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…gles-tabs.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 959B (33% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ck-config.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 879B (30% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ols/forms.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 874B (33% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ster-ajax.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 561B (37% reduction).
designweek.co.uk Desktop Resource Breakdown
Total Resources | 121 |
Number of Hosts | 20 |
Static Resources | 56 |
JavaScript Resources | 42 |
CSS Resources | 8 |
designweek.co.uk mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2016-11-20
designweek.co.uk Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 80Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 23 blocking script resources and 8 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://assets.adobedtm.com/e7901bd22e2c2fdba32bf9…5bf463671fa505ecda0.js
https://www.designweek.co.uk/wordpress/wp-includes…y/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/wordpress/wp-includes…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design….js?ver=1.0-1478600972
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design….js?ver=1.0-1478600972
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/plugins/icit-…min.js?ver=-1478600972
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…tvids.min.js?ver=1.0.3
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…modernizr.js?ver=3.3.1
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…slick.min.js?ver=2.0.0
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…direction.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ols/forms.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ustom.min.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…aceholder.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ster-ajax.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ck-config.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…tickybits.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…gles-tabs.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…min.js?ver=-1478600972
https://s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js?ver=2
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/plugins/doubleclick/js/doubleclick.js
https://www.designweek.co.uk/wordpress/wp-includes…embed.min.js?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/plugins/icit-…js/tabbed.min.js?ver=1
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ss/fonts.css?ver=4.5.4
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ck/slick.css?ver=2.0.0
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…=1478600964-1478600972
https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ignweek/css/global.css
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/plugins/doubl…ck.css?ver=-1478600972
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ch.css?ver=-1478600972
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/themes/design…ck.css?ver=-1478600972
priority - 19Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 183.5KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…slick.min.js?ver=2.0.0 could save 30KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ignweek/css/global.css could save 26.2KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…modernizr.js?ver=3.3.1 could save 9.7KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…tickybits.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 6.7KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ustom.min.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 4.8KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…aceholder.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 3.7KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ss/fonts.css?ver=4.5.4 could save 3KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them….js?ver=1.0-1478600972 could save 2.8KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ck.css?ver=-1478600972 could save 2.3KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ck-config.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 2.3KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…gles-tabs.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 2KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them….js?ver=1.0-1478600972 could save 2KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ch.css?ver=-1478600972 could save 1.7KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ols/forms.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 1.7KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…direction.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 1.5KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…min.js?ver=-1478600972 could save 1.3KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ck/slick.css?ver=2.0.0 could save 1.1KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ster-ajax.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 949B (62% reduction).
Compressing https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…tvids.min.js?ver=1.0.3 could save 868B (53% reduction).
priority - 8Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://assets.adobedtm.com/e7901bd22e2c2fdba32bf9…5bf463671fa505ecda0.js (expiration not specified)
https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ignweek/css/global.css (expiration not specified)
https://www.designweek.co.uk/content/plugins/doubleclick/js/doubleclick.js (expiration not specified)
https://m.addthisedge.com/live/boost/ra-54eb16d604…_ate.track.config_resp (60 seconds)
https://s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js?ver=2 (10 minutes)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TQFXSV (15 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://aka-cdn.adtech.de/dt/common/DAC.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 8Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 8Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 76.4KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…-Believe-Ideas-Ltd.jpg could save 19KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…112609/Nu-Creative.jpg could save 17.2KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…2016/11/10162222/F.jpg could save 16.7KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/d…HSF_Blog_1-667x500.jpg could save 3.5KiB (13% reduction).
priority - 3Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 27KiB (20% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ignweek/css/global.css could save 8KiB (24% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ck.css?ver=-1478600972 could save 855B (26% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ss/fonts.css?ver=4.5.4 could save 796B (20% reduction).
priority - 1Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 13.9KiB (41% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them….js?ver=1.0-1478600972 could save 2.1KiB (50% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…aceholder.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 1.8KiB (35% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…direction.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 1.3KiB (52% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them….js?ver=1.0-1478600972 could save 1.2KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…gles-tabs.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 959B (33% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ck-config.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 879B (30% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ols/forms.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 874B (33% reduction).
Minifying https://d3atsf3fgek2rw.cloudfront.net/content/them…ster-ajax.js?ver=4.5.4 could save 561B (37% reduction).
designweek.co.uk Mobile Resource Breakdown
Total Resources | 112 |
Number of Hosts | 17 |
Static Resources | 54 |
JavaScript Resources | 37 |
CSS Resources | 8 |
designweek.co.uk mobile page usability
Last tested: 2016-11-20
designweek.co.uk Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 0Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="http://www.cen….co.uk/privacy">Privacy & Cookies Policy</a>
and 1 others are close to other tap targets.<a class="close-button">X</a>
is close to 2 other tap targets.<button type="submit" class="sub-button">Go</button>
is close to 3 other tap targets.designweek.co.uk HTML validation
Errors
Bad value “en-UK” for attribute “lang” on element “html”: Bad region subtag.
"...E 9]><!--> <html lang="en-UK" prefix="og: http://ogp.me/ns#" class="no-ie no-js"> <!--<..."
A document must not include more than one “meta” element with its “name” attribute set to the value “description”.
".../seo/ --> <meta name="description" content="The UK's leading online design magazine. Bringing you the latest news and inspiration across graphics, branding, interiors, digital, product, furniture and more."/> <link..."
Bad value “https://api.w.org/” for attribute “rel” on element “link”: The string “https://api.w.org/” is not a registered keyword.
"...</script> <link rel='https://api.w.org/' href='https://www.designweek.co.uk/wp-json/' /> <link..."
A “link” element with a “sizes” attribute must have a “rel” attribute that contains the value “icon” or the value “apple-touch-icon”.
"....png" /> <link rel="apple-touch-icon-precomposed" sizes="64x64" href="https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/designweek/prod/content/uploads/2016/06/15100954/DW_64x64.png" /> <lin..." Line: 203 Column: 2 - 176
"....png" /> <link rel="apple-touch-icon-precomposed" sizes="96x96" href="https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/designweek/prod/content/uploads/2016/06/15100956/DW_96x96.png" /> <lin..." Line: 204 Column: 2 - 180
"....png" /> <link rel="apple-touch-icon-precomposed" sizes="144x144" href="https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/designweek/prod/content/uploads/2016/06/15100957/DW_144x144.png" /> <lin..." Line: 205 Column: 2 - 180
"....png" /> <link rel="apple-touch-icon-precomposed" sizes="192x192" href="https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/designweek/prod/content/uploads/2016/06/15101000/DW_192x192.png" /> <lin..." Line: 206 Column: 2 - 180
"....png" /> <link rel="apple-touch-icon-precomposed" sizes="228x228" href="https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/centaur-wp/designweek/prod/content/uploads/2016/06/15101001/DW_228x228.png" /> <lin..."
Element “style” not allowed as child of element “body” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
"...age"> <style scoped="scoped"> #c..."
Element “style” not allowed as child of element “div” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
"...-lead"> <style scoped="scoped"> .c..."
Attribute “scoped” not allowed on element “style” at this point.
"... hentry"> <style scoped="scoped">articl..." Line: 571 Column: 114 - 136
"... hentry"> <style scoped="scoped">articl..." Line: 580 Column: 114 - 136
"... hentry"> <style scoped="scoped">articl..." Line: 589 Column: 114 - 136
"... hentry"> <style scoped="scoped">articl..." Line: 598 Column: 114 - 136
"... hentry"> <style scoped="scoped">articl..."
Bad value “__bkframe” for attribute “name” on element “iframe”: Browsing context name started with the underscore.
"... Tag --> <iframe name="__bkframe" height="0" width="0" frameborder="0" style="display:none;position:absolute;clip:rect(0px 0px 0px 0px)" src="about:blank"></ifra..."
The “frameborder” attribute on the “iframe” element is obsolete. Use CSS instead.
"... Tag --> <iframe name="__bkframe" height="0" width="0" frameborder="0" style="display:none;position:absolute;clip:rect(0px 0px 0px 0px)" src="about:blank"></ifra..."
Warnings
Consider avoiding viewport values that prevent users from resizing documents.
"...TF-8" /> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, maximum-scale=1, user-scalable=no" /> <tit..."
Empty heading.
"...advanced"><h3 class="widget-title"></h3><..."
The “navigation” role is unnecessary for element “nav”.
"...e-menu"> <nav class="topload-navigation" role="navigation"> <a ..."
The “contentinfo” role is unnecessary for element “footer”.
"...</div> <footer class="site-footer" role="contentinfo"> <n..."
designweek.co.uk similar domains
www.designweek.net
www.designweek.org
www.designweek.info
www.designweek.biz
www.designweek.us
www.designweek.mobi
www.esignweek.co.uk
www.designweek.co.uk
www.xesignweek.co.uk
www.dxesignweek.co.uk
www.xdesignweek.co.uk
www.sesignweek.co.uk
www.dsesignweek.co.uk
www.sdesignweek.co.uk
www.eesignweek.co.uk
www.deesignweek.co.uk
www.edesignweek.co.uk
www.resignweek.co.uk
www.dresignweek.co.uk
www.rdesignweek.co.uk
www.fesignweek.co.uk
www.dfesignweek.co.uk
www.fdesignweek.co.uk
www.cesignweek.co.uk
www.dcesignweek.co.uk
www.cdesignweek.co.uk
www.dsignweek.co.uk
www.dwsignweek.co.uk
www.dewsignweek.co.uk
www.dwesignweek.co.uk
www.dssignweek.co.uk
www.dessignweek.co.uk
www.ddsignweek.co.uk
www.dedsignweek.co.uk
www.ddesignweek.co.uk
www.drsignweek.co.uk
www.dersignweek.co.uk
www.deignweek.co.uk
www.dewignweek.co.uk
www.deswignweek.co.uk
www.deeignweek.co.uk
www.deseignweek.co.uk
www.dedignweek.co.uk
www.desdignweek.co.uk
www.dezignweek.co.uk
www.deszignweek.co.uk
www.dezsignweek.co.uk
www.dexignweek.co.uk
www.desxignweek.co.uk
www.dexsignweek.co.uk
www.deaignweek.co.uk
www.desaignweek.co.uk
www.deasignweek.co.uk
www.desgnweek.co.uk
www.desugnweek.co.uk
www.desiugnweek.co.uk
www.desuignweek.co.uk
www.desjgnweek.co.uk
www.desijgnweek.co.uk
www.desjignweek.co.uk
www.deskgnweek.co.uk
www.desikgnweek.co.uk
www.deskignweek.co.uk
www.desognweek.co.uk
www.desiognweek.co.uk
www.desoignweek.co.uk
www.desinweek.co.uk
www.desifnweek.co.uk
www.desigfnweek.co.uk
www.desifgnweek.co.uk
www.desivnweek.co.uk
www.desigvnweek.co.uk
www.desivgnweek.co.uk
www.desitnweek.co.uk
www.desigtnweek.co.uk
www.desitgnweek.co.uk
www.desibnweek.co.uk
www.desigbnweek.co.uk
www.desibgnweek.co.uk
www.desiynweek.co.uk
www.desigynweek.co.uk
www.desiygnweek.co.uk
www.desihnweek.co.uk
www.desighnweek.co.uk
www.desihgnweek.co.uk
www.desigweek.co.uk
www.desigbweek.co.uk
www.designbweek.co.uk
www.desighweek.co.uk
www.designhweek.co.uk
www.desigjweek.co.uk
www.designjweek.co.uk
www.desigjnweek.co.uk
www.desigmweek.co.uk
www.designmweek.co.uk
www.desigmnweek.co.uk
www.designeek.co.uk
www.designqeek.co.uk
www.designwqeek.co.uk
www.designqweek.co.uk
www.designaeek.co.uk
www.designwaeek.co.uk
www.designaweek.co.uk
www.designseek.co.uk
www.designwseek.co.uk
www.designsweek.co.uk
www.designeeek.co.uk
www.designweeek.co.uk
www.designeweek.co.uk
www.designwek.co.uk
www.designwwek.co.uk
www.designwewek.co.uk
www.designwweek.co.uk
www.designwsek.co.uk
www.designwesek.co.uk
www.designwdek.co.uk
www.designwedek.co.uk
www.designwdeek.co.uk
www.designwrek.co.uk
www.designwerek.co.uk
www.designwreek.co.uk
www.designwewk.co.uk
www.designweewk.co.uk
www.designwesk.co.uk
www.designweesk.co.uk
www.designwedk.co.uk
www.designweedk.co.uk
www.designwerk.co.uk
www.designweerk.co.uk
www.designwee.co.uk
www.designweej.co.uk
www.designweekj.co.uk
www.designweejk.co.uk
www.designweei.co.uk
www.designweeki.co.uk
www.designweeik.co.uk
www.designweem.co.uk
www.designweekm.co.uk
www.designweemk.co.uk
www.designweel.co.uk
www.designweekl.co.uk
www.designweelk.co.uk
www.designweeo.co.uk
www.designweeko.co.uk
www.designweeok.co.uk
designweek.co.uk Ping
Ping is a computer network administration software utility used to test the reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. It measures the round-trip time for messages sent from the originating host to a destination computer that are echoed back to the source.
designweek.co.uk TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a computer network diagnostic tool for displaying the route (path) and measuring transit delays of packets across an Internet Protocol (IP) network. The history of the route is recorded as the round-trip times of the packets received from each successive host (remote node) in the route (path); the sum of the mean times in each hop is a measure of the total time spent to establish the connection. Traceroute proceeds unless all (three) sent packets are lost more than twice, then the connection is lost and the route cannot be evaluated.