BJS.COM Website Information

bjs.com Website Information

Daily Unique Visits: 87,102

Daily Page Views: 522,612

Income Per Day: $1,045

Estimated Value: $752,400

This website is located in United States and is using following IP address 199.83.128.239. See the complete list of popular websites hosted in United States.

bjs.com is registered under .COM top-level domain. Please check other sites in .COM zone.

Website bjs.com is using the following name servers:

  • chartis.naii.net
  • onoma.naii.net
  • diorizo.naii.net
  • metafrazo.naii.net

and is probably hosted by Akamai International B.V.. See the full list of other websites hosted by Akamai International B.V..

The highest website bjs.com position in Alexa rank database was 12728 and the lowest rank position was 18691. Current position of bjs.com in Alexa rank database is 16466.

Desktop speed score of bjs.com (49/100) is better than the results of 22.8% of other sites and shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

Mobile usability score of bjs.com (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed score of bjs.com (53/100) is better than the results of 39.51% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Advertisement

bjs.com Alexa Rank

The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and is a combined measure of page views and users.


bjs.com whois

WHOIS gives you the ability to lookup any generic domains to find out the registered domain holder. WHOIS database are provided for information purposes only. It allows the public to check whether a specific domain name is still available or not and to obtain information related to the registration records of existing domain names.


Domain Name: BJS.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1101521_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.brandsight.com
Registrar URL: http://gcd.com
Updated Date: 2023-09-18T15:11:24Z
Creation Date: 1997-04-12T04:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-02-21T04:59:59Z
Registrar: GoDaddy Corporate Domains, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 3786
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@gcd.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.5189669187
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: A1-71.AKAM.NET
Name Server: A12-65.AKAM.NET
Name Server: A13-67.AKAM.NET
Name Server: A14-67.AKAM.NET
Name Server: A16-67.AKAM.NET
Name Server: A7-64.AKAM.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2024-09-10T20:20:02Z

bjs.com server information

Servers Location

bjs.com desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-12-01


Desktop Speed Bad
49/100

bjs.com Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 96Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 935KiB (59% reduction).

Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img36108_580x290.jpg could save 145.8KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33898_580x290.jpg could save 81.7KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img36103_2280x800.jpg could save 70.2KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img36107_580x290.jpg could save 65.3KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://dnisjsqid2b9p.cloudfront.net/ClientPaths/bjs/bjs_img_set.png could save 53.4KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…978&recipeName=400x400 could save 51.9KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33726_580x290.jpg could save 38KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…611&recipeName=400x400 could save 37.5KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…891&recipeName=400x400 could save 35.5KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…069&recipeName=400x400 could save 35KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…663&recipeName=400x400 could save 32.3KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…757&recipeName=400x400 could save 30.5KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…918&recipeName=400x400 could save 27KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33727_580x290.jpg could save 19.7KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…167&recipeName=400x400 could save 19.2KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…004&recipeName=400x400 could save 19.1KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33728_580x290.jpg could save 18.8KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…516&recipeName=400x400 could save 17.5KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…898&recipeName=400x400 could save 16.8KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…196&recipeName=400x400 could save 16.7KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…120&recipeName=400x400 could save 16.3KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…095&recipeName=400x400 could save 14.5KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…628&recipeName=400x400 could save 9.2KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…875&recipeName=160x160 could save 3.5KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…865&recipeName=160x160 could save 3.3KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…494&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.9KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…191&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.9KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…668&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.8KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…908&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…931&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.3KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…734&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.2KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…842&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.9KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…865&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.8KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…386&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…777&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…907&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…367&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…508&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…990&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…965&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.5KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…071&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.5KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…574&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.5KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…695&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…387&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…974&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…955&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…145&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…294&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.3KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…016&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…553&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.1KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…720&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…413&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…420&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…354&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…299&recipeName=160x160 could save 969B (31% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…230&recipeName=160x160 could save 968B (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…671&recipeName=160x160 could save 944B (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…532&recipeName=160x160 could save 894B (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…816&recipeName=160x160 could save 876B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…988&recipeName=160x160 could save 844B (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…343&recipeName=160x160 could save 823B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…968&recipeName=160x160 could save 805B (34% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…250&recipeName=160x160 could save 800B (24% reduction).

priority - 10Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 9 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/tm/prod.js
http://www.hlserve.com/Delivery/ClientPaths/Library/hook.js?cid=507
http://mathid.mathtag.com/d/i.js
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/site.es6.js
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/analytic-events.js
http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/handlebars.j…dlebars.runtime.min.js
http://edge1.certona.net/cd/da8dbc7c/bjs.com/scripts/resonance.js
http://libs.coremetrics.com/eluminate.js
http://www.bjs.com/wcsstore/BJs/javascript/coremetrics/cmcustom.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:400,400i,500,700
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/www.bjs.com.css

priority - 7Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://dnisjsqid2b9p.cloudfront.net/ClientPaths/bjs/bjs_img_set.png (expiration not specified)
http://edge1.certona.net/cd/da8dbc7c/bjs.com/scripts/resonance.js (expiration not specified)
http://libs.coremetrics.com/configs/90393428.js (expiration not specified)
http://libs.coremetrics.com/eluminate.js (expiration not specified)
http://tmscdn.coremetrics.com/tms/dispatcher-v3.js (expiration not specified)
https://libs.coremetrics.com/ddxlibs/json-min.js (expiration not specified)
https://libs.coremetrics.com/ddxlibs/yahoo-min.js (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/cms/4.json (5 minutes)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/tm/prod.js (10 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/1125318400890312?v=2.8.1 (20 minutes)
http://mathid.mathtag.com/d/i.js (60 minutes)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/scripts/BrandCMS/v3.x/bbbcms.min.js (60 minutes)
http://cdn.inspectlet.com/inspectlet.js?wid=1980915118&r=420051 (4 hours)
http://d2oh4tlt9mrke9.cloudfront.net/Record/js/sessioncam.recorder.js (4 hours)

priority - 2Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 9% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.

priority - 0Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 680B (16% reduction).

Minifying http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/handlebars.j…dlebars.runtime.min.js could save 680B (16% reduction) after compression.

bjs.com Desktop Resource Breakdown

Total Resources110
Number of Hosts22
Static Resources81
JavaScript Resources25
CSS Resources2

bjs.com mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-11-30


Mobile Speed Bad
53/100

bjs.com Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 40Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 9 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/tm/prod.js
http://www.hlserve.com/Delivery/ClientPaths/Library/hook.js?cid=507
http://mathid.mathtag.com/d/i.js
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/site.es6.js
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/analytic-events.js
http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/handlebars.j…dlebars.runtime.min.js
http://edge1.certona.net/cd/da8dbc7c/bjs.com/scripts/resonance.js
http://libs.coremetrics.com/eluminate.js
http://www.bjs.com/wcsstore/BJs/javascript/coremetrics/cmcustom.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:400,400i,500,700
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/www.bjs.com.css

priority - 38Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 367.4KiB (28% reduction).

Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33898_580x290.jpg could save 66.8KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://dnisjsqid2b9p.cloudfront.net/ClientPaths/bjs/bjs_img_set.png could save 53.4KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img35496_580x290.jpg could save 22.1KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img35495_580x290.jpg could save 17.8KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…191&recipeName=400x400 could save 17.7KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…395&recipeName=400x400 could save 17.3KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…891&recipeName=400x400 could save 15.3KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…246&recipeName=400x400 could save 12.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…663&recipeName=400x400 could save 10.1KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…506&recipeName=400x400 could save 10KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…866&recipeName=400x400 could save 8.1KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33726_580x290.jpg could save 6.5KiB (13% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…120&recipeName=400x400 could save 6.3KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…004&recipeName=400x400 could save 5.5KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…699&recipeName=400x400 could save 5.5KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…524&recipeName=400x400 could save 5.5KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33727_580x290.jpg could save 5.4KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33728_580x290.jpg could save 4.8KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…937&recipeName=400x400 could save 4.8KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…639&recipeName=400x400 could save 4.7KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…771&recipeName=400x400 could save 3.6KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…628&recipeName=400x400 could save 3KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…494&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.9KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…191&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.9KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…668&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.8KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…908&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…640&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.7KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…218&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.5KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…734&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.2KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…842&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.9KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…628&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.9KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…672&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.7KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…386&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…777&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…907&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…367&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…508&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…335&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…965&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.5KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…695&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…387&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…974&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…955&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…145&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…925&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.3KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…630&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.3KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…603&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.2KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…016&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…890&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.2KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…553&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.1KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…620&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.1KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…720&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…299&recipeName=160x160 could save 969B (31% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…230&recipeName=160x160 could save 968B (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…671&recipeName=160x160 could save 944B (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…532&recipeName=160x160 could save 894B (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…816&recipeName=160x160 could save 876B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…508&recipeName=160x160 could save 862B (25% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…833&recipeName=160x160 could save 838B (17% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…343&recipeName=160x160 could save 823B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…250&recipeName=160x160 could save 800B (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…914&recipeName=160x160 could save 782B (19% reduction).

priority - 11Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://dnisjsqid2b9p.cloudfront.net/ClientPaths/bjs/bjs_img_set.png (expiration not specified)
http://edge1.certona.net/cd/da8dbc7c/bjs.com/scripts/resonance.js (expiration not specified)
http://libs.coremetrics.com/configs/90393428.js (expiration not specified)
http://libs.coremetrics.com/eluminate.js (expiration not specified)
http://tmscdn.coremetrics.com/tms/dispatcher-v3.js (expiration not specified)
https://libs.coremetrics.com/ddxlibs/json-min.js (expiration not specified)
https://libs.coremetrics.com/ddxlibs/yahoo-min.js (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/cms/4.json (5 minutes)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/tm/prod.js (10 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/1125318400890312?v=2.8.1 (20 minutes)
http://mathid.mathtag.com/d/i.js (60 minutes)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/scripts/BrandCMS/v3.x/bbbcms.min.js (60 minutes)
http://cdn.inspectlet.com/inspectlet.js?wid=1980915118&r=420009 (4 hours)
http://d2oh4tlt9mrke9.cloudfront.net/Record/js/sessioncam.recorder.js (4 hours)

priority - 8Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 20% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.

priority - 0Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 680B (16% reduction).

Minifying http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/handlebars.j…dlebars.runtime.min.js could save 680B (16% reduction) after compression.

bjs.com Mobile Resource Breakdown

Total Resources108
Number of Hosts22
Static Resources81
JavaScript Resources25
CSS Resources2

bjs.com mobile page usability

Last tested: 2017-11-30


Mobile Usability Good
99/100

bjs.com Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 0Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <div class="title-cart">0Cart</div> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="/products/index.html">Product Index</a> and 2 others are close to other tap targets.

bjs.com HTML validation

Warnings

Consider avoiding viewport values that prevent users from resizing documents.

Line: 6 Column: 1 - 105
"...tent=421> <meta name=viewport content="user-scalable=no, initial-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=1.0, width=device-width"> <link..."

Section lacks heading. Consider using “h2”-“h6” elements to add identifying headings to all sections.

Line: 52 Column: 1 - 39
"...v> </div> <section id=header class="bjs-header "> <div ..." Line: 496 Column: 1 - 50
".../section> <section class="footer-links show-for-small-only"> <ul c..." Line: 530 Column: 1 - 46
".../section> <section class="footer-links show-for-medium"> <div ..."

Errors

Bad value “” for attribute “href” on element “link”: Must be non-empty.

Line: 7 Column: 1 - 51
"...e-width"> <link rel="shortcut icon" href="" type="image/png"> <meta..."

Bad start tag in “img” in “head”.

Line: 34 Column: 11 - 130
"...<noscript><img height=1 width=1 style=display:none src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1125318400890312&ev=PageView&noscript=1"></noscri..."

An “img” element must have an “alt” attribute, except under certain conditions. For details, consult guidance on providing text alternatives for images.

Line: 34 Column: 11 - 130
"...<noscript><img height=1 width=1 style=display:none src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1125318400890312&ev=PageView&noscript=1"></noscri..." Line: 158 Column: 1 - 48
"..._-Perks"> <img class=join-img src="/images/home-join.jpg"> </a> ..." Line: 180 Column: 1 - 55
"..._-Perks"> <img class="join-img " src="/images/home-join-med.jpg"> </a> ..." Line: 211 Column: 1 - 70
"..._-Perks"> <img class="join-img show-for-small-only" src="/images/home-join.png"> <img ..." Line: 212 Column: 1 - 70
"...oin.png"> <img class="join-img show-for-medium" src="/images/home-join-med.jpg"> </a> ..."

Stray end tag “noscript”.

Line: 34 Column: - 141
"......"

Stray end tag “head”.

Line: 35 Column: 1 - 7
"...noscript> </head> <body..."

Start tag “body” seen but an element of the same type was already open.

Line: 36 Column: 1 - 6
"...> </head> <body> <div ..."

Element “p” not allowed as child of element “button” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)

Line: 74 Column: 40 - 59
"...nu></span><p class=icon-title></p> <..."

Attribute “kb-navigation” not allowed on element “div” at this point.

Line: 94 Column: 1 - 195
"...a> </div> <div id=search-tool class="search-wrap ng-pristine ng-untouched ng-valid ng-scope ng-not-empty" data-ng-controller="searchController as search" kb-navigation="" data-ng-model=search.selectedItem> <form..."

Element “h3” not allowed as child of element “ul” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)

Line: 191 Column: 1 - 4
"...ll-only"> <h3>Shop b..."

bjs.com similar domains

Similar domains:
www.bjs.com
www.bjs.net
www.bjs.org
www.bjs.info
www.bjs.biz
www.bjs.us
www.bjs.mobi
www.js.com
www.bjs.com
www.vjs.com
www.bvjs.com
www.vbjs.com
www.gjs.com
www.bgjs.com
www.gbjs.com
www.hjs.com
www.bhjs.com
www.hbjs.com
www.njs.com
www.bnjs.com
www.nbjs.com
www.bs.com
www.bns.com
www.bjns.com
www.bhs.com
www.bjhs.com
www.bus.com
www.bjus.com
www.bujs.com
www.bis.com
www.bjis.com
www.bijs.com
www.bks.com
www.bjks.com
www.bkjs.com
www.bms.com
www.bjms.com
www.bmjs.com
www.bj.com
www.bjw.com
www.bjsw.com
www.bjws.com
www.bje.com
www.bjse.com
www.bjes.com
www.bjd.com
www.bjsd.com
www.bjds.com
www.bjz.com
www.bjsz.com
www.bjzs.com
www.bjx.com
www.bjsx.com
www.bjxs.com
www.bja.com
www.bjsa.com
www.bjas.com
www.bjs.con

bjs.com Ping

Ping is a computer network administration software utility used to test the reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. It measures the round-trip time for messages sent from the originating host to a destination computer that are echoed back to the source.


bjs.com TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a computer network diagnostic tool for displaying the route (path) and measuring transit delays of packets across an Internet Protocol (IP) network. The history of the route is recorded as the round-trip times of the packets received from each successive host (remote node) in the route (path); the sum of the mean times in each hop is a measure of the total time spent to establish the connection. Traceroute proceeds unless all (three) sent packets are lost more than twice, then the connection is lost and the route cannot be evaluated.