AMMANTRY.COM Website Information Website Information

Daily Unique Visits: 0

Daily Page Views: 0

Income Per Day: $0

Estimated Value: $9 is registered under .COM top-level domain. Please check other sites in .COM zone.

No name server records were found.

and is probably hosted by AS-26496-GO-DADDY-COM-LLC -, LLC, US. See the full list of other websites hosted by AS-26496-GO-DADDY-COM-LLC -, LLC, US.

The highest website position in Alexa rank database was 105974 and the lowest rank position was 973471. Current position of in Alexa rank database is below 1 million.

Desktop speed of is unknown.

Mobile usability score of (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed score of (52/100) is better than the results of 37.6% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Advertisement Alexa Rank

The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and is a combined measure of page views and users. whois

WHOIS gives you the ability to lookup any generic domains to find out the registered domain holder. WHOIS database are provided for information purposes only. It allows the public to check whether a specific domain name is still available or not and to obtain information related to the registration records of existing domain names.

Registry Domain ID: 970394634_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server:
Registrar URL:
Updated Date: 2018-12-10T07:15:04Z
Creation Date: 2007-05-12T05:42:54Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2021-05-12T05:42:54Z
Registrar:, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form:
>>> Last update of whois database: 2021-01-29T12:44:53Z server information

Servers Location mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-04-06

Mobile Speed Bad
52/100 Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary

priority - 48Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 25 blocking script resources and 31 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1…bed-form.js?ver=4.7.10…frontend.js?ver=1.3.37…elect.min.js?ver=3.0.2……ncat.min.js?ver=1.3.37…een-0.4.1.js?ver=0.4.1…lery_box.js?ver=1.3.37…ugingallery.js?ver=9.1…tion/wow.js?ver=4.7.10…gation.js?ver=20151215…parallax.js?ver=4.7.10…carousel.js?ver=4.7.10…s/custom.js?ver=4.7.10…?ver=3.51.0-2014.06.20…/js/scripts.js?ver=4.7…us-fix.js?ver=20151215…oadxt.min.js?ver=1.8.2…rcset.min.js?ver=1.8.2…xt.extend.js?ver=1.8.2…p_frontend.js?ver=2.58…popup_init.js?ver=2.58…lorbox-min.js?ver=2.58

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:…ic-popup.css?ver=1.1.2…ss/slick.css?ver=1.1.2…l-public.css?ver=1.1.2…css/styles.css?ver=4.7…ed-form.css?ver=4.7.10…rontend.css?ver=1.3.37…-awesome.css?ver=4.6.3…rollbar.css?ver=1.3.37…moselect.css?ver=3.0.2…yles.min.css?ver=2.2.8…C700%2C700i&ver=4.7.10…ome.min.css?ver=4.7.10…600i,700,700i,800,800i…arousel.css?ver=4.7.10…e-style.css?ver=4.7.10…ponsive.css?ver=4.7.10…animate.css?ver=4.7.10…spinner.css?ver=4.7.10…min.css?ver=1497337059…animate.css?ver=4.7.10…/sgthemes.css?ver=2.58…ortcodes.css?ver=4.9.9…icons/css/fontello.css

priority - 16Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:…assets/css/loading.gif (expiration not specified)…s/lazy_placeholder.gif (expiration not specified)…images/ajax-loader.gif (expiration not specified)…icons/css/fontello.css (expiration not specified)…ery/loading_center.gif (expiration not specified)…mages/bottom-quote.png (expiration not specified)…/testimonial-arrow.png (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (expiration not specified) (15 minutes)

priority - 16Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 154.4KiB (23% reduction).

Compressing could save 63.9KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing could save 41.6KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing could save 21.7KiB (13% reduction).
Compressing could save 6.9KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing could save 5.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing could save 4.1KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing could save 2.8KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing could save 2.3KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing could save 2.1KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing…/testimonial-arrow.png could save 1.2KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing…mages/bottom-quote.png could save 1.1KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing could save 1.1KiB (55% reduction).

priority - 9Reduce server response time

priority - 8Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 44% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
Click to see the screenshot with only the HTML response:

priority - 1Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 10.7KiB (26% reduction).

Minifying…carousel.js?ver=4.7.10 could save 5.8KiB (34% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…p_frontend.js?ver=2.58 could save 1.1KiB (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…een-0.4.1.js?ver=0.4.1 could save 603B (25% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…/js/scripts.js?ver=4.7 could save 502B (14% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…tion/wow.js?ver=4.7.10 could save 425B (13% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…gation.js?ver=20151215 could save 420B (37% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…frontend.js?ver=1.3.37 could save 398B (23% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…bed-form.js?ver=4.7.10 could save 380B (24% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…parallax.js?ver=4.7.10 could save 363B (46% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…s/custom.js?ver=4.7.10 could save 327B (40% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…lery_box.js?ver=1.3.37 could save 318B (15% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…us-fix.js?ver=20151215 could save 149B (32% reduction) after compression.

priority - 1Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 6.4KiB (19% reduction).

Minifying could save 3.1KiB (23% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…icons/css/fontello.css could save 596B (49% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…moselect.css?ver=3.0.2 could save 472B (19% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…animate.css?ver=4.7.10 could save 455B (11% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…rollbar.css?ver=1.3.37 could save 373B (23% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…e-style.css?ver=4.7.10 could save 359B (13% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…ponsive.css?ver=4.7.10 could save 248B (11% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…ic-popup.css?ver=1.1.2 could save 233B (13% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…rontend.css?ver=1.3.37 could save 197B (12% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…arousel.css?ver=4.7.10 could save 193B (18% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…l-public.css?ver=1.1.2 could save 172B (12% reduction) after compression.
Minifying…ortcodes.css?ver=4.9.9 could save 113B (32% reduction) after compression. Mobile Resource Breakdown

Total Resources89
Number of Hosts9
Static Resources30
JavaScript Resources31
CSS Resources26 mobile page usability

Last tested: 2019-04-06

Mobile Usability Good
99/100 Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary

priority - 0Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <div class="owl-dots"></div> is close to 1 other tap targets. HTML validation similar domains

Similar domains:
www.ammantry.con Ping

Ping is a computer network administration software utility used to test the reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. It measures the round-trip time for messages sent from the originating host to a destination computer that are echoed back to the source. TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a computer network diagnostic tool for displaying the route (path) and measuring transit delays of packets across an Internet Protocol (IP) network. The history of the route is recorded as the round-trip times of the packets received from each successive host (remote node) in the route (path); the sum of the mean times in each hop is a measure of the total time spent to establish the connection. Traceroute proceeds unless all (three) sent packets are lost more than twice, then the connection is lost and the route cannot be evaluated.